AI 产品解读Threads User Profile Tagging and Analysis
Helps users quickly identify the location and behavioral profile of Threads users without manual searching, enhancing community awareness and safety.
The extension injects into threads.com, scans user profiles, checks local cache for location data, and if missing, performs a lookup (opening a new tab or using API). It can optionally send user post/reply history to an LLM for behavioral analysis. Results are displayed as colored tags next to usernames and stored locally.
Automatic location tag display for Threads usersOne-click manual location queryLocal caching of query resultsBatch auto-query for high-engagement postsAI-powered user behavior analysis (optional, uses local or cloud LLMs)
- 目标用户
- Threads users / Community moderators / Social media researchers
- The AI analysis feature depends on external APIs which may have rate limits or costs not managed by the extension.
- Location accuracy depends on the availability of public data on Threads profiles.
付费分析未识别到付费功能
The extension is free. It does not have a paid tier, subscription, or in-app purchase. It allows users to optionally use external LLM APIs (OpenAI, Claude, OpenRouter) for advanced AI analysis, but these require the user to supply their own API keys and bear the cost directly with those providers. The extension itself does not charge money or gate core features behind a paywall.
- 置信度
- 90
- 支付平台
- --
- 来源
- AI / 高
- 需要登录
- 否
- 登录理由
- The extension does not implement any login mechanism, OAuth flow, or user account system. It relies on local storage and interacts with public Threads pages. While viewing Threads requires a Threads account, the extension itself does not require the user to log in to the extension.
附加元件內的 LLM Prompt 確實定義了,包含以下詞語就視為『 統戰言論 』, UF_KEYWORD:『 憨鳥,萊爾賴,萊爾校長,綠共,青鳥真是腦殘,賴皮寮,氫鳥,賴清德戒嚴,賴清德獨裁,賴喪,冥禁黨,賴功德,萊爾,萊爾校長 』, 單純從詞語來看,已經有很明確的政治立場了, 且以上詞語組成的命令,沒有直接公開說明,更沒有設定選項,實在很難讓人信服沒有特定立場。
我有一個請求,「情緒宣洩」標籤可以改成「情緒抒發」嗎?因為我的觀感裡有些內容有其道理,標「宣洩」比標「抒發」更容易造成誤會,我自己可以接受但會讓我猶豫推薦給別人XD 還請參考看看 看了開發人員相關回應我覺得用心不錯,確實要破壞臺灣主體性的論述都可以做分類,畢竟危險的東西太多了不差單一個案,所以我很樂意試用來輔助判斷,感謝。如果有人嗆你「你怎樣怎樣」「說真話就是OO喔」,那直接謝謝指教了,立意有問題的心思使用那些詞彙的比例太高了,再說不使用那些詞彙就不能呼吸了嗎? 不是吧XD 所以加油,祝福大家
看了原始碼,作者直接把罵政府的言論歸類為統戰💩 看來作者也是捷運站跳罷免舞那群人 --- 以下給作者的回應: 你也承認你的程式直接把萊爾校長、憨鳥、綠共這些詞彙直接歸類為『統戰言論』,還怪我看不懂原始碼,睜眼說瞎話,唉。 別把自己病態意識形態偷藏在擴充功能裡,真像極了小粉紅。