稳定信号未识别高风险权限组合

Trace GPT AI Detector by PlagiarismCheck.org

Check content, websites, and emails for AI presence with an accurate Trace GPT AI Detector by PlagiarismCheck.org

用户数4K当前公开安装规模

评分4.3商店平均评分

评论数28公开评论体量

Manifest 版本V3插件平台版本

7日增长0近 7 天净增用户

7日增长率0%相对周增长速度

视觉预览

Trace GPT AI Detector by PlagiarismCheck.org 媒体预览

5 项素材

趋势

用户增长趋势

按已采集快照查看用户数变化。

用户增长趋势

评分趋势

近 7 日评分趋势

展示最近 7 日窗口内已采集的评分快照，辅助判断近期评分是否稳定。

7 日评分变化

起始值

4.32

日/周/月增长表现

同口径展示 1 天、7 天、30 天的绝对增长与增长率。

1日增长持平

00%

7日增长持平

00%

30日增长减少

-1K-20%

技术摘要

版本、语言与抓取信息

查看发布时间、版本、支持语言、最近更新和抓取时间。

版本1.0.10

ManifestV3

大小167KiB

语言数1English

发布时间--

插件简介

查看插件说明、主要功能和适用场景。

Find out whether the text is human-written or AI-generated with our ChatGPT Detector and be confident in the web content's authenticity.

Browse safely 🔒by using a secure AI Writing Detector and ensure the posts on blogs or social media, reviews on the websites, and web texts are human-written. An accurate and free AI Detector Chrome Extension becomes handy in your everyday browsing, teaching, or business routine.

Just select the text you want to check on the webpage and launch our AI Detector Chrome Extension, or paste your text in the Extension window to get an accurate, reliable result in no time.

How you can benefit from Trace GPT AI Detector:

💡Rely on the real 97% accuracy with extremely low false-positives

💡Catch popular AI generators, including Google Bard and ChatGPT

评价

最新评论快照

查看最近评论和评分分布。

商店综合星级4.3Chrome 商店给出的聚合评分，包含只有打分但没有同步评论正文的情况

已同步评论均分4.3仅基于下方已同步评论正文计算

有内容评论27已同步的评论正文数量

总评分/评论数28Chrome 商店公开评分/评论计数

商店综合星级：4.3。下方星级分布只统计已同步评论正文；如果某个插件只有公开分数、没有真实评论正文，这里可能为空。

5★

4★

3★

2★

1★

Ana Fernandes2025年7月17日

cool!!!

Kwame Owusu2025年7月17日

awesome checker, but please, know how to read

oisin2024年4月3日

Had AI write two paragraphs, both with 0.00% AI likeliness rate. Seems like a complete waste of time for me while checking applications. Bad extension.

Desirée Moya Derkoyorikian2024年1月29日

My virus blocker blocked it.

Karisa Cloutier2023年11月15日

I don't know. I checked 3 writing samples that were completely written by me from start to finish and it said that it was over 60% likely AI. Do I write like a bot? Is it the way I use certain vocabulary words? I'm dissapointed.

Ahmed Al-Alousi2023年10月26日

I can't believe the level of false positive this thing generates. More worryingly, it seems that commentators here seem to think that this tool, and others like it, are the next best thing to sliced bread!!. Gave me a likelihood of AI generation on my own original work. The issue here, it would seem, is the amount of bias and training (or lack thereof) in the model, which makes it think that it's actually doing the job; and as a computer scientist and researcher, I know the challenges underlying even the thought of tools like these; and as an academic, whilst I find it useful to judge how much of the content a student submits is AI-generated, I find it questionable that the use of AI-supported tools should be an ethical issue, given that just about every automated decision making system out there uses AI and ML by default.