Google Scholar Button
Lookup scholarly articles as you browse the web.
Advanced Insights into Google Scholar Profiles.
按已采集快照查看用户数变化。
展示最近 7 日窗口内已采集的评分快照,辅助判断近期评分是否稳定。
同口径展示 1 天、7 天、30 天的绝对增长与增长率。
查看发布时间、版本、支持语言、最近更新和抓取时间。
查看插件说明、主要功能和适用场景。
GScholarLENS is a browser extension designed for academics, researchers, and enthusiasts who want deeper insights into publication data and contribution of an author from Google Scholar.
查看最近评论和评分分布。
商店综合星级:3.1。下方星级分布只统计已同步评论正文;如果某个插件只有公开分数、没有真实评论正文,这里可能为空。
查看 Chrome 商店详情页中的相关产品。
Lookup scholarly articles as you browse the web.
Adds DBLP-verified CORE/SJR venue ranks, raw GSVR scores, completeness diagnostics, and reports to Scholar profiles.
Calculates author self-citation rates on Google Scholar using DBLP, OpenCitation, and OpenAlex data.
scite allows users to see how a publication has been cited, providing the citation context and classification
Show IF, JCR quartiles, OA status, Top 2% insight, O-index, Scholar profile infographics, and smart author-position highlighting.
Summarizes research articles, creates interactive flashcards, highlights key points, links to open-access versions of each citation
Very useful tool.
I don't get the same result with the same profile on two browsers. One is very wrong.... what's the go?
This is a terrible extension. After using it to analyze few Google Scholar profiles, my access to Google Scholar was blocked because it sends too many requests from your IP address. I haven’t been able to access Google Scholar for two days now and I keep getting the following message: "Our systems have detected unusual traffic from your computer network. Please try your request again later. Why did this happen?" There’s no reCAPTCHA checkbox at all. In the end I had to reset IP address on my modem settings because turning it off and on did not do the job.
This tool demonstrates a wrong approach backed by NO scientific data. This is common when developers have little to no clue about what they are doing. The listing of authors doesn't necessarily correspond to author efforts, more so with correspondence. Developers sat down, hand-picked a handful of sources, wrote a single paper and assumed it was a novel approach.
Wrong approach to quantification of research relevance and participation of researchers in project based on applying a discipline-specific author order to ANY research output of ANY field is inconsistent with scientific practice and should not be considered. I commend the attempt to make researcher stats more than citations and h-index, but this is not the way forward.
Great initiative. Really helpful for undergrads like me who look for mentorship in our Universities and others. Great going 👍
Much needed initiative
Very useful and helps to get better insights
This extension is genuinely helpful. The only one of a kind extension in the store. Thanks to IIT-Hyderabad and Sishir Anand Indupalli for recommending this!