Rabby Wallet

Phoenix Kukini2025年4月2日

★★★★★1

Was excited to add this to Chrome since it said it worked with all EVM chains, but turns out it doesn't. For whatever reason, they must manually exclude PulseChain, which is not alright with me. Sick of things claiming to be DeFi but completely centralized garbage. If I wanted that, I'd just use an exchange and not my own wallet. Uninstalling.

M H I Siriwardena2025年4月2日

★★★★★1

I have been using rabby for several months now and they suddenly stopped supporting the products (Pulsechain) I use without any explanation whatsoever. now I am forced to use a buggy wallet that keeps failing me. these guys suck.

nige m2025年4月2日

★★★★★1

I was using this wallet everyday then they pulled support for the products i used.

Paul Morris2025年4月2日

★★★★★1

The Rabby crypto wallet, once touted as a "game-changer" for Ethereum and EVM chains, has revealed its true colors—and they’re as dull and disappointing as a rug-pull in slow motion. What started as a promising tool for multi-chain enthusiasts has devolved into a glaring example of everything wrong with centralized decision-making masquerading as decentralized innovation. The recent decision to drop support for PulseChain—a blockchain that embodies the ethos of affordability, speed, and community-driven crypto—is nothing short of a betrayal of the principles that "true crypto" stands for. Let’s be real: PulseChain isn’t just another network; it’s a bold fork of Ethereum that slashes fees, boosts throughput, and burns tokens to prioritize users over profiteers. It’s the kind of project that aligns with the moral backbone of cryptocurrency—decentralization, accessibility, and defiance against bloated, elitist systems. Rabby’s choice to abandon it reeks of cowardice or, worse, a calculated pivot to appease some unseen corporate overlord. Where’s the spine? Where’s the commitment to the little guy who’s tired of $50 gas fees? Nowhere, apparently. The wallet’s team didn’t just stop at axing PulseChain support—they’ve doubled down by blocking users from even adding it as a custom network. That’s right: Rabby’s not content with turning its back on a vibrant community; it’s actively locking the door and throwing away the key. This isn’t a technical oversight; it’s a power play, a middle finger to anyone who dares to believe in a crypto ecosystem that doesn’t bow to the loudest voices or the deepest pockets. For a wallet that once prided itself on flexibility and user empowerment, this move exposes a hollow core—Rabby’s all about control, not freedom. And let’s talk about ethics and morals, shall we? True crypto is about transparency, resilience, and sticking to your guns when the going gets tough. Rabby’s silence on why they ditched PulseChain—no explanation, no dialogue, just a quiet removal—shows a disdain for accountability that would make a Wall Street banker blush. The community begged for answers, offered to help, and got nothing but a cold shoulder. This isn’t just poor customer service; it’s a slap in the face to the very ideals of decentralization they once claimed to champion. The interface? Sure, it’s slick—until it’s not supporting the chain you need. The security features? Fine, if you ignore the fact that they’re now gatekeeping your access to networks they don’t approve of. Rabby’s gone from a wallet you could trust to a glorified babysitter that decides what you’re allowed to play with. If you want a tool that respects the spirit of crypto—freedom, choice, and a middle finger to centralized nonsense—look elsewhere. Rabby’s proven it’s just another poser in a space that’s already drowning in them. Two stars, and that’s being generous—it’s a shell of what it could’ve been, gutted by its own hypocrisy.

Poseidon2025年4月2日

★★★★★1

Oh, bravo, I'll totally rewrite my review once you geniuses at Rabby decide to grace us with PulseChain again. It’s only sitting pretty in the top 10 for activity among EVMs, yet you’ve yanked it like it’s some irrelevant side project. Truly a masterstroke of shortsighted brilliance.

Robert Kim2025年4月2日

★★★★★1

Removed one of the busiest networks, pulsechain for duckchain. Just terrible

Kiyoshi Hashigami2025年4月2日

★★★★★1

最低。急に説明なくチェーンサポートを撤去されて、所有資産が詐欺被害にあったのかと非常に焦った。２度と使わないし、誰にも勧められない。

Joe2025年4月2日

★★★★★1

Lacking "ALL" EVMs. But hey, at least there is DuckChain!

Fuku Industries2025年4月2日

★★★★★1

Woke up this morning and had an anxiety attack because all my wallets seem to have been drained. Turns out support for my main use blockchain was rugged for no stated reason. This is totally against the decentralization ethos of Web3 and blockchain tech. Will not use again, and will not recommend to anyone ever.

x (Vit3min4k)2025年4月2日

★★★★★1

Pulsechain integration discontinued