稳定信号未识别到付费功能高风险权限组合
Paperpile Extension icon

Paperpile Extension

Collect, organize, annotate and cite your research papers in Chrome.

用户数200K当前公开安装规模
评分4.6商店平均评分
评论数195公开评论体量
Manifest 版本V3插件平台版本
7日增长0近 7 天净增用户
7日增长率0%相对周增长速度
视觉预览

Paperpile Extension 媒体预览

6 项素材
趋势

用户增长趋势

按已采集快照查看用户数变化。

用户增长趋势

200K200K200K200K200K2026年7月15日2026年7月18日2026年7月21日最新值: 200K
评分趋势

近 7 日评分趋势

展示最近 7 日窗口内已采集的评分快照,辅助判断近期评分是否稳定。

7 日评分变化

起始值
4.57
最新值
4.57
7 日评分变化
0.00
4.474.524.574.624.672026年7月15日2026年7月18日2026年7月21日最新值: 4.57
2026年7月15日2026年7月21日
增长概览

日/周/月增长表现

同口径展示 1 天、7 天、30 天的绝对增长与增长率。

1日增长持平
00%
7日增长持平
00%
30日增长持平
00%
技术摘要

版本、语言与抓取信息

查看发布时间、版本、支持语言、最近更新和抓取时间。

版本1.5.1018
ManifestV3
大小10.1MiB
语言数1English
发布时间
最近更新
最近抓取
English
简介

插件简介

查看插件说明、主要功能和适用场景。

Note: If you see a warning about Paperpile's extension "being not supported soon", you can safely ignore it. Exciting new features are coming to Paperpile and its extension, which will be rolled out automatically in the coming weeks.

This extension works with Paperpile, a clean and simple reference and citation manager. Sign up for Paperpile at https://paperpile.com

Students, researchers, scientists, doctors, postdocs, PIs, and professors 💛 Paperpile:

⭐️ Collect your papers while browsing

✓ Import citations and PDFs from hundreds of publisher sites including Nature, Science, Springer, ScienceDirect, Wiley and many more

✓ Deep integration with PubMed, Google Scholar, ArXiv, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, EBSCO, and hundreds of University library catalogues

评价

最新评论快照

查看最近评论和评分分布。

商店综合星级4.6Chrome 商店给出的聚合评分,包含只有打分但没有同步评论正文的情况
已同步评论均分4.5仅基于下方已同步评论正文计算
有内容评论132已同步的评论正文数量
总评分/评论数195Chrome 商店公开评分/评论计数

商店综合星级:4.6。下方星级分布只统计已同步评论正文;如果某个插件只有公开分数、没有真实评论正文,这里可能为空。

5
106
4
7
3
3
2
7
1
9
David Yardley2016年10月17日
5

I have used a few reference managers over the years, including my University's RefWorks, but found Paperpile to be the simplest. Clean layout and integrates well with Google Docs. Good support for importing and annotating PDFs. Quite happy to pay the yearly fee.

语言 en
David McLaren2016年10月12日
5

Does exactly what it says on the box, amazing. So smooth and easy to use compared to endnote. I just wish I could import lists from databases like Medline etc... it could just be that I don't know how to work it out though

语言 en
1 有用 · 0 无用
Matt MW2016年10月12日
5

Incredible reference management software. I was a Zotero fanatic before I tried this. As Matthew Collins' review essentially says - can't beat it!

版本 1.5.727语言 en
1 有用 · 0 无用
Joel Livingston2016年9月27日
5

Works great, glad I found it.

语言 en
Max Rempel2016年9月27日
5

best ever. More userfriendly than Evernote or Refman

语言 en
Kai Larsen2016年8月5日
5

Fantastic citation manager. Paperpile allowed me to write my entire thesis within google docs, making my workflow immeasurably smoother. Having all papers saved online in the cloud combined with google docs meant that I could use different computers and never worry about data loss. I just wish I had found it sooner!

语言 en
1 有用 · 0 无用
Meng Chen2016年7月28日
5

That's how it should work

语言 en
1 有用 · 0 无用
Renato César Ferreira de Souza2016年7月13日
5

I love Paperpile. Who knows other types of endnoting software will love. I would like to suggest a tool that permits making marks by the readers in the pdf gotten through the application.

语言 en
Yuri Tenshi2016年5月31日
5

Muito melhor do que os outros programas que se propõem a fazer a mesma coisa por ser o mais bem organizado e versátil, possibilitando que seja possível categorizar e organizar os artigos relacionados ao mesmo assunto de diferentes formas. E além disso, pelo paperpile é possível organizar e criar referências com a simplicidade de um clique. E graças a ferramenta de busca do paperpile eu sempre tenho acesso a todas as informações e dados que preciso para escrever e submeter projetos ou defender uma hipótese, e o melhor: em qualquer lugar.

语言 pt
3 有用 · 0 无用
Konrad Rudolph2016年5月27日
5

Best citation manager software by a long shot; phenomenal integration with Google Docs. Small minus is that it (currently) only works online, and that export to BibTeX requires manual postprocessing (citation keys are arbitrary, some fields result in wrong LaTeX commands); however, these flaws are shared with other citation managers.

语言 en
3 有用 · 0 无用