Google Scholar Button
Lookup scholarly articles as you browse the web.
Show links to existing PubPeer comments
按已采集快照查看用户数变化。
展示最近 7 日窗口内已采集的评分快照,辅助判断近期评分是否稳定。
同口径展示 1 天、7 天、30 天的绝对增长与增长率。
查看发布时间、版本、支持语言、最近更新和抓取时间。
查看插件说明、主要功能和适用场景。
This plugin indicates PubPeer comments wherever they appear. A lightweight plugin to install and forget about. You will only notice that the plugin exists when it alerts you that an article has comments on PubPeer.
*No affiliation with the PubMed nor any journals.
查看最近评论和评分分布。
商店综合星级:3.7。下方星级分布只统计已同步评论正文;如果某个插件只有公开分数、没有真实评论正文,这里可能为空。
查看 Chrome 商店详情页中的相关产品。
Lookup scholarly articles as you browse the web.
EasyPubMedicine makes PubMed easy to use
Academic research assistant - find full-text PDFs, citations, and analyze papers
Collect, organize, annotate and cite your research papers in Chrome.
Legally get full text of scholarly articles as you browse.
scite allows users to see how a publication has been cited, providing the citation context and classification
PubPeer seems like a good project and I fully agree with the idea of open comments. This browser extension works well, but is often a bit annoying: the PubPeer bar at the top of the page appears only after the page has loaded, which causes the page contents to suddenly shift down. This could be fixed by having another indicator (maybe a small fixed-pos sidebar like Scite or Hypothesis do). Another problem is mentioned by Balázs Knakker below: The PubPeer bar appears and says "There are 2 articles on this page with PubPeer comments" (neither of those comments were particularly enlightening or relevant to article I was quickly checking out). This makes the high saliency of the PubPeer bar not worth it.
Works great. I use it all the time. PubPeer is a vitally important tool for holding the practice of science to the ideals of science.
Seems to be working great! Displays notifications on PubMed, journal websites and search engines. Can click through from the notification to the PubPeer page. Thanks
nice
Random pop-ups on non-pubpeer pages are unacceptable. (got pop-up idk about what on google.com)
When using PubMed, the displayed article is another article, which is not accurate enough
I love and highly appreciate PubPeer, but I find the way the extension works annoying and misguided. In particular, I am not interested in whether cited or linked papers on a page have comments on PubPeer or not. Really, never. I think it would make a lot more sense to just show the top bar if the currently viewed paper has comments on pubpeer. Perhaps comments of linked papers could get a little number in the app's icon, or just could be left out altogether.
New update is great! Love this plugin!
Lovely idea. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to work. At all. Will keep installed, and update review if anything changes.
Excellent idea but seems to be useless since : - you can't create anonymous account * - the only scientist that are allowed to post are the one who have published something *. (As everybody knows publishing is a sign of knowledge honesty and wisdom) * "All first and last authors of articles in our database can create an account." A simple flagging system, would have suffice to ban spammers and others low quality comments.