MyBib: Free Citation Generator
教育 / Education
疑似付费置信度 92平台 Stripe
Automatically create APA style, MLA format, and Harvard referencing style citations with our citation generator add-on for Chrome.
用户数
1M
评分
4.8
评论数
1,594
7 天增长
0|0%
稳定信号未识别高风险权限组合
Cite This For Me: Web Citer
Automatically create website citations in the APA, MLA, Chicago, or Harvard referencing styles at the click of a button.
用户数400K当前公开安装规模
评分3.8商店平均评分
评论数485公开评论体量
Manifest 版本V3插件平台版本
7日增长0近 7 天净增用户
7日增长率0%相对周增长速度
视觉预览
3 项素材Cite This For Me: Web Citer 媒体预览
趋势
用户增长趋势
按已采集快照查看用户数变化。
用户增长趋势
评分趋势
近 7 日评分趋势
展示最近 7 日窗口内已采集的评分快照，辅助判断近期评分是否稳定。
7 日评分变化
起始值
3.78
最新值
3.78
7 日评分变化
0.00
2026年7月15日2026年7月21日
增长概览
日/周/月增长表现
同口径展示 1 天、7 天、30 天的绝对增长与增长率。
1日增长持平
00%7日增长持平
00%30日增长持平
00%技术摘要
版本、语言与抓取信息
查看发布时间、版本、支持语言、最近更新和抓取时间。
版本2.7.0
ManifestV3
大小391KiB
语言数1English
发布时间
最近更新
最近抓取
English
简介
插件简介
查看插件说明、主要功能和适用场景。
Simply browse to the page you wish to cite and click the button to generate a correctly formatted citation. Then copy-and-paste the citation into your assignment, or add it to your online bibliography for safe keeping until later.
You can also add other sources (like books, journals, and newspapers) from our main tool at http://www.citethisforme.com
Sources are cited using the following format editions:
APA: 6th edition
Chicago: 16th edition
MLA: 7th edition
评价
最新评论快照
查看最近评论和评分分布。
商店综合星级3.8Chrome 商店给出的聚合评分，包含只有打分但没有同步评论正文的情况
已同步评论均分3.2仅基于下方已同步评论正文计算
有内容评论211已同步的评论正文数量
总评分/评论数485Chrome 商店公开评分/评论计数
商店综合星级：3.8。下方星级分布只统计已同步评论正文；如果某个插件只有公开分数、没有真实评论正文，这里可能为空。
相关推荐
同类与相关插件
查看 Chrome 商店详情页中的相关产品。
Google Dictionary (by Google)
工具 / Tools
View definitions easily as you browse the web.
用户数
2M
评分
4.4
评论数
13,722
7 天增长
0|0%
CiteMaker CiteWeb | APA 6th Edn.
工具 / Tools
疑似付费置信度 92平台 PayPal
CiteMaker is for formatting academic citations and reference lists.
用户数
5K
评分
2.8
评论数
16
7 天增长
+1K|25%
Citation Manager for Google Chrome™
工作流程与规划 / Workflow & Planning
Quickly cite a Website Source for writing essays & research papers
用户数
8K
评分
3.8
评论数
18
7 天增长
0|0%
Weava Highlighter - PDF & Web
工作流程与规划 / Workflow & Planning
Best highlighting tool for Website and PDF. FREE and easy to use.
用户数
200K
评分
4.0
评论数
2,753
7 天增长
0|0%
Cite Creator
工作流程与规划 / Workflow & Planning
Constructs debate cites from html tags or page info and copies to clipboard.
用户数
10K
评分
4.5
评论数
28
7 天增长
0|0%
Almost always wrong
Absolutely useless compared to what RefME did.
It does the citations incorrectly almost every single time. The authors name are jumbled up and it keeps on citing only websites and not journals. Have to manually key it in literally almost every single time now. Refme is so much better and accurate.
The purchase of RefMe by Cite This For Me has lead to an appalling reduction in service. Key features including a intuitive layout and a working search were critical to RefME. Something that CTFM does not have. Please bring back RefME
So far so good
Referencing inaccuate, can't save it to a specific bibliography. Awful compared to RefMe!
As a former user of Refme who was forced to switch over, I am NOT happy. Refme citations were much more accurate, and it had the ability to sort citations into projects. Bleh! I want Refme back!
Barely ever parses the right information. If you're gonna take over RefMe, you should at least have superior systems first.
I am very unhappy with this extension. It contantly gets the entire citation wrong and its bugs consistently get in the way of being productive. has been more trouble that its worth
The transition from RefMe to CiteThisForMe has been terrible. I've lost loads of work for my final dissertation because of this. I have logged into CiteThisForMe and there isn't a single reference or quote to be seen. You've just set me back days! I am going to have trust issues with anything cloud based for years to come.