Glider Proctoring

John Sprunger2023年10月8日

★★★★★1

Terrible, one of the worst user experiences I've ever had.

Edgar Albedi2023年10月7日

★★★★★1

Estoy en total desacuerdo que se tenga que usar una aplicación de este tipo, es intrusiva he invasiva. espero en el tiempo poder rechazar a la empresa que use esta aplicación como la razón a no continuar.

Curtis McCoy2023年9月18日

★★★★★1

Highly invasive and unrealistic "proctoring" tool for very paranoid businesses. It's only really suitable for first-round assessments, where the kind of "cheating" they're aiming to catch would be of no value to an applicant, since if passed, the first interaction with a live person would immediately out them. I say unrealistic because I haven't seen a real remote interviewer (and certainly not a job) who flat bans the use of any reference material during an interview. Would not recommend - any company doing automated remote assessments, there are better less invasive ways to do these kinds of "take-home tests". Being so paranoid at this stage before meeting prospective employees is a very bad look.

Scott Cook2023年8月22日

★★★★★1

As other users have said, invasive, outdated, false positives and an incredibly elementary way to test programmers.

Frank Hall2023年8月11日

★★★★★1

TLDR; I am a professional not a highschooler and refuse to work with any company that treats its employees as juveniles. The intrusion of this software is beyond acceptable. The amount of security I had to disable just to satisfy its requirements was unbelievable. Afterwards there was no accountability of what data was being pulled from my system, web browser, password store, web camera, microphone, etc and to whom it was going. No control whatsoever of my personal identifying information. Failed to even properly identify where on the screen I was looking thus constantly intruded. Perhaps I will change my mind if companies that use this allow anonymous users to access their corporate networks without any oversight to make those companies just as vulnerable as they wish their employees be.

Layth Ezzeir2023年6月11日

★★★★★1

Disgusting, invasive, doesn't work, companies use it when they shouldn't. Doesn't allow for use on guest accounts which would prevent whoever is on the other end of this accessing all my information. Had to make a whole new google account just to take an exam with this. Garbage.

Jose Carlos Moreno2023年5月22日

★★★★★1

Same complaints as the rest, mistakes minor eye movement for looking off screen even though the questions, next button, video screen, etc are all at the edges of the screen. Excessively invasive, questions are both multiple choice and don't reflect work environment, etc. Pointless and time wasteful "cognitive test" that pops up in the middle of the test.

Romo Islam2023年5月1日

★★★★★1

Most of the questions asked very out dated information for react native and typescript. The proctor app kept saying my eyes were moving too much even though it was just to check the answers on the left side. In the middle of the exam it stopped me to do this unnecessary question which had nothing to do with the job. Overall a horrible interview experience since this does not do anything to test a interviewers ability work in the real world.

Dawen Liang2023年4月27日

★★★★★1

This proctor is disgusting. You can use the camera, you can capture the screen. But don't suspend the test and give some boring little tricks to distract the candidates and then ask for ALT + Tab for 5 seconds. Grinding leetcode-style questions is OK, but why can't I change to Python if a question is algorithm-oriented? Using different programming languages saving boilerplate code doesn't matter.

Dhruv2023年4月4日

★★★★★1

Really Bad even just moving your head a bit flags you