Ink for Google™
Workflow & Planning
Get your favourite Google sites a new coat of paint. Update their look with Material Design
Users
10K
Rating
4.7
Reviews
665
7D Growth
0|0%
Stable signalNo paid features detectedLow-risk permissions
Wikiwand - Wikipedia Modernized
Wikipedia, beautifully redesigned. Timelines, top questions, fact-checking, and more. AI built in.
Users200KCurrent public install base
Rating4.7Store average score
Reviews7,972Public review volume
Manifest versionV3Extension platform version
7-day growth0Net users gained this week
7-day growth rate0%Relative weekly velocity
Preview
6 assetsWikiwand - Wikipedia Modernized Media preview
Trend
User growth trend
Review user movement across collected snapshots.
User Growth Over Time
Rating trend
7-day rating trend
View collected rating snapshots from the latest 7-day window to assess rating stability.
7-day rating change
Start
4.72
Latest
4.71
7-day rating change
-0.01
2026年7月15日2026年7月21日
Growth overview
Daily, weekly, and monthly growth
Compare 1-day, 7-day, and 30-day net growth and growth rate.
1-day growthNo data
----7-day growthFlat
00%30-day growthNo data
----Technical snapshot
Version, languages, and crawl freshness
Review publication date, version, supported languages, and crawl timestamps.
Version11.0.0
ManifestV3
Size12.24KiB
Languages1English (United States)
Published
Store updated
Last crawled
English (United States)
Overview
Product summary
Review the store description, core capabilities, and common use cases.
As featured on TechCrunch, Lifehacker, Gizmodo, Fast Company, and The Next Web:
Wikipedia holds the world's knowledge. Wikiwand gives it the interface it deserves.
The extension works quietly in the background - every Wikipedia link opens in Wikiwand's clean, modern reader instead. No setup, no configuration. Just Wikipedia, the way it should look.
⭐🕒 Timelines: Every article with a story gets a visual timeline. Because some things are best understood from the very beginning.
⭐🤔 Top Questions: A lightning-fast, accurate, and complete picture of any topic - right alongside the article.
⭐💬 Chat: A reading copilot that understands exactly what you're reading and can answer any question with depth and accuracy.
Reviews
Recent review snapshot
Inspect the latest comments and rating distribution.
Store average score4.7Chrome Web Store aggregate rating, including ratings without synced review text
Synced text average4.5Average computed only from synced review bodies below
Reviews with text2,801Synced review bodies
Total ratings / reviews7,972Chrome Web Store public rating/review count
Store average score: 4.7. The bars below are calculated from synced review text only, so they may be empty for extensions that have public ratings but no synced comments yet.
Related products
Similar and related extensions
Review related products from the Chrome Web Store detail page.
Extensity
Workflow & Planning
FreemiumConfidence 64
Quickly enable/disable Google Chrome extensions
Users
200K
Rating
4.8
Reviews
1,812
7D Growth
0|0%
Just Read
Functionality & UI
FreemiumConfidence 64
A feature-packed, customizable reader extension.
Users
200K
Rating
4.7
Reviews
907
7D Growth
0|0%
Raindrop.io
Workflow & Planning
FreemiumConfidence 64
All-in-one bookmark manager
Users
400K
Rating
4.1
Reviews
779
7D Growth
0|0%
WIKI 2. Wikipedia Republished
Workflow & Planning
Advanced Magic for Wikipedia.
Users
5K
Rating
4.4
Reviews
75
7D Growth
0|0%
Black Menu for Wikipedia
Education
Easy access to the Wikipedia universe
Users
3K
Rating
4.5
Reviews
78
7D Growth
0|0%
I like WikiWand so much, and got used to it. When I saw an old Wikipedia in a different computer, it felt like a bug in the matrix :-)
Very fast loads and the pages are rendered beautifully. The preview option on the links is superb. It sometimes feels like the pages are shorter, but maybe it's just psychological.
every thing i want to know i can find on wikipedia
sunder...............
Graet plugin
Using it all the time, great service
I only have two extensions on my browser. An ad blocker and this one. It's really that good.
Looks good.
terrible
Beautiful, why doesn't wikipedia look like this? Will never go back.