paperGuard
工作流程与规划 / Workflow & Planning
疑似付费置信度 88平台 Stripe
On the paper search site, the SCI journal ranking is displayed
用户数
7K
评分
4.2
评论数
5
7 天增长
0|0%
稳定信号未识别到付费功能中风险权限组合
Rapid Journal Quality Check
Displays rankings and h-index for academic journals next to Google Scholar search results.
用户数200K当前公开安装规模
评分4.2商店平均评分
评论数68公开评论体量
Manifest 版本V3插件平台版本
7日增长0近 7 天净增用户
7日增长率0%相对周增长速度
视觉预览
5 项素材Rapid Journal Quality Check 媒体预览
趋势
用户增长趋势
按已采集快照查看用户数变化。
用户增长趋势
评分趋势
近 7 日评分趋势
展示最近 7 日窗口内已采集的评分快照，辅助判断近期评分是否稳定。
7 日评分变化
起始值
4.19
最新值
4.19
7 日评分变化
0.00
2026年7月13日2026年7月19日
增长概览
日/周/月增长表现
同口径展示 1 天、7 天、30 天的绝对增长与增长率。
1日增长持平
00%7日增长持平
00%30日增长持平
00%技术摘要
版本、语言与抓取信息
查看发布时间、版本、支持语言、最近更新和抓取时间。
版本4.1.2
ManifestV3
大小4.32MiB
语言数1English
发布时间
最近更新
最近抓取
English
简介
插件简介
查看插件说明、主要功能和适用场景。
Rapid Quality Check for Academic Journals in Google Scholar Search Results
This Chrome extension displays an academic journal's (and some conference's) rankings next to search results from Google Scholar. This also works for scholar profile pages on Google Scholar and other subpages (e.g. cited by, etc.).
A variety of rankings are available for the user to choose from (SJR, ABDC, ABS, VHB, FT50, CORE, ...). These are interdisciplinary (e.g., SJR, BFI), focused on economics/social sciences (e.g., ABDC, VHB, ...), or focused on computer science journals/conferences (CORE, CCF).
Hovering your cursor over the ranking gives you additional information such as the name of the journal and its h-index. Clicking on the "+" (if available) gives you additional rankings; those that you have not pre-selected.
Via the extension's icon (which you can pin) you can also access a search bar to enter a journal name and get the ranking.
This extension uses/builds upon:
评价
最新评论快照
查看最近评论和评分分布。
商店综合星级4.2Chrome 商店给出的聚合评分，包含只有打分但没有同步评论正文的情况
已同步评论均分4.0仅基于下方已同步评论正文计算
有内容评论54已同步的评论正文数量
总评分/评论数68Chrome 商店公开评分/评论计数
商店综合星级：4.2。下方星级分布只统计已同步评论正文；如果某个插件只有公开分数、没有真实评论正文，这里可能为空。
相关推荐
同类与相关插件
查看 Chrome 商店详情页中的相关产品。
SciSpace: Do hours of research in minutes
工具 / Tools
免费增值置信度 64
Your AI research assistant for understanding scientific literature.
用户数
200K
评分
4.4
评论数
144
7 天增长
0|0%
Google Scholar PDF Reader
工作流程与规划 / Workflow & Planning
Supercharge your paper reading: follow references, skim outline, jump to figures, cite and save.
用户数
2M
评分
4.1
评论数
693
7 天增长
--|--
Mendeley Web Importer
工作流程与规划 / Workflow & Planning
Fast, convenient import of references and PDFs to your Mendeley Reference Manager library.
用户数
3M
评分
2.3
评论数
3,139
7 天增长
0|0%
Scopus Document Download Manager
工作流程与规划 / Workflow & Planning
Scopus authenticated users can download PDF files directly from Scopus!
用户数
1M
评分
1.9
评论数
280
7 天增长
0|0%
Self-Citations Checker
教育 / Education
Calculates author self-citation rates on Google Scholar using DBLP, OpenCitation, and OpenAlex data.
用户数
3K
评分
3.9
评论数
8
7 天增长
0|0%
wonderful tool!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A useful tool for quickly assessing journal quality while exploring research papers. However, the quality index lists need more frequent updates, as many seem outdated. Developers are encouraged to incorporate the latest sources, and I am happy to assist with authentic references of journal quality lists, if needed.
It is the perfect extension for scholars who want to improve their knowledge of the Journal's quality. A small request for the team is to update the AJG 2024!
just today I got a reading error, the article should not be in Q2 because the journal is "Jurnal Bisnis dan Pembangunan" but when I looked at the Q2 icon, it turned out to read the journal "economica" which is a local sub-journal, the article was incorrectly ranked Scopus by RJQC
One of the best extensions ever known to man. Keep the hard work guys, it helps a lot.
The study link is not activated in addition to the summary, Please keep updating the database. We don't have to see journal quality lists back and forth saving us a lot of time. Thank you team.
Please keep updating the database. We don't have to see journal quality lists back and forth saving us a lot of time. Thank you team.
Firstly, hats off to the developers for such an useful tool. secondly please update the rankings from time to time, for example for the journal "Management review quarterly" ABDC shows "NA", but in real, it is ranked "C". Thanks in advance, I hope these changes are made for the improvement of this "supertool".
Thank you, you saved me
It is good idea. Very helpful. However there are small challanges such as in case of "Economic and Political Weekly" B on ABDC but is not listed. The link on EPW would lend at Higher Education Abstract(https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hea.12103_23).