paperGuard
工作流程与规划 / Workflow & Planning
疑似付费置信度 88平台 Stripe
On the paper search site, the SCI journal ranking is displayed
用户数
7K
评分
4.2
评论数
5
7 天增长
0|0%
稳定信号未识别到付费功能中风险权限组合
Rapid Journal Quality Check
Displays rankings and h-index for academic journals next to Google Scholar search results.
用户数200K当前公开安装规模
评分4.2商店平均评分
评论数68公开评论体量
Manifest 版本V3插件平台版本
7日增长0近 7 天净增用户
7日增长率0%相对周增长速度
视觉预览
5 项素材Rapid Journal Quality Check 媒体预览
趋势
用户增长趋势
按已采集快照查看用户数变化。
用户增长趋势
评分趋势
近 7 日评分趋势
展示最近 7 日窗口内已采集的评分快照，辅助判断近期评分是否稳定。
7 日评分变化
起始值
4.19
最新值
4.19
7 日评分变化
0.00
2026年7月13日2026年7月19日
增长概览
日/周/月增长表现
同口径展示 1 天、7 天、30 天的绝对增长与增长率。
1日增长持平
00%7日增长持平
00%30日增长持平
00%技术摘要
版本、语言与抓取信息
查看发布时间、版本、支持语言、最近更新和抓取时间。
版本4.1.2
ManifestV3
大小4.32MiB
语言数1English
发布时间
最近更新
最近抓取
English
简介
插件简介
查看插件说明、主要功能和适用场景。
Rapid Quality Check for Academic Journals in Google Scholar Search Results
This Chrome extension displays an academic journal's (and some conference's) rankings next to search results from Google Scholar. This also works for scholar profile pages on Google Scholar and other subpages (e.g. cited by, etc.).
A variety of rankings are available for the user to choose from (SJR, ABDC, ABS, VHB, FT50, CORE, ...). These are interdisciplinary (e.g., SJR, BFI), focused on economics/social sciences (e.g., ABDC, VHB, ...), or focused on computer science journals/conferences (CORE, CCF).
Hovering your cursor over the ranking gives you additional information such as the name of the journal and its h-index. Clicking on the "+" (if available) gives you additional rankings; those that you have not pre-selected.
Via the extension's icon (which you can pin) you can also access a search bar to enter a journal name and get the ranking.
This extension uses/builds upon:
评价
最新评论快照
查看最近评论和评分分布。
商店综合星级4.2Chrome 商店给出的聚合评分，包含只有打分但没有同步评论正文的情况
已同步评论均分4.0仅基于下方已同步评论正文计算
有内容评论54已同步的评论正文数量
总评分/评论数68Chrome 商店公开评分/评论计数
商店综合星级：4.2。下方星级分布只统计已同步评论正文；如果某个插件只有公开分数、没有真实评论正文，这里可能为空。
相关推荐
同类与相关插件
查看 Chrome 商店详情页中的相关产品。
SciSpace: Do hours of research in minutes
工具 / Tools
免费增值置信度 64
Your AI research assistant for understanding scientific literature.
用户数
200K
评分
4.4
评论数
144
7 天增长
0|0%
Google Scholar PDF Reader
工作流程与规划 / Workflow & Planning
Supercharge your paper reading: follow references, skim outline, jump to figures, cite and save.
用户数
2M
评分
4.1
评论数
693
7 天增长
--|--
Mendeley Web Importer
工作流程与规划 / Workflow & Planning
Fast, convenient import of references and PDFs to your Mendeley Reference Manager library.
用户数
3M
评分
2.3
评论数
3,139
7 天增长
0|0%
Scopus Document Download Manager
工作流程与规划 / Workflow & Planning
Scopus authenticated users can download PDF files directly from Scopus!
用户数
1M
评分
1.9
评论数
280
7 天增长
0|0%
Self-Citations Checker
教育 / Education
Calculates author self-citation rates on Google Scholar using DBLP, OpenCitation, and OpenAlex data.
用户数
3K
评分
3.9
评论数
8
7 天增长
0|0%
It is showing personnel review - emerald journal in Q2 where as it is in Q1 and it has many glitches
Thank you for consolidating all the SJR (Scimago Journal & Country Rank) into a single venture. Your work is commendable! However, there are still several tasks to address, including fixing issues related to the ranking of non-ranked articles and ensuring proper hyperlinks between different articles. Recently, I noticed that the quick summary of articles categorized as % Q1, %Q2, %Q3, and N/A has disappeared. As a suggestion, instead of displaying ‘N/A,’ consider coding it as empty.
It make google scholar more valuable. Much helpful. How we can get summary of Q ranking papers of a researcher, like how much % Q1, how much % Q2 etc.
A useful tool for researchers.
ABDC List and SJR are still the old ones. Please update the journal latest ABDC list. Moreover, I see that getting on a list shows some quality over others. But, still showing a journal as red color (those that have a low ranking such as AJG 1, or ABDC - C, creates negative image of the journal which is unfair). Hence, the color scheme should be planned in a way that it does not create negative image of the journals that are already on the lists.
Scientific Journal Ranking is good but should based on WoS more. I saw the other ranking are for business, economic, and computer science. It will be more interesting if you add more ranking for engineering field. One more thing is Impact Factor adding.
It takes data from Scimago page where discontinued journals also showing Q1,Q2 quartiles and this also indicate same without verification.. not reliable for Scimago and Also there is no ranking for the Web of Science metrices ... use with cautions
Very good tool! However, it will be great to link it to the Scopus Journal Metrics as the are public too.
The current version is good as it can help recognize the quality of an article based on the rankings/quartiles. However, it would be great to also include WoS rankings.
Works. Charming.