Cooling signalUnknownMedium-risk permissions
Rotector - Roblox Safety Warnings icon

Rotector - Roblox Safety Warnings

Real-time warnings about inappropriate Roblox users before you interact with them.

Users50KCurrent public install base
Rating2.7Store average score
Reviews367Public review volume
Manifest versionV3Extension platform version
7-day growth-10KNet users gained this week
7-day growth rate-16.7%Relative weekly velocity
Preview

Rotector - Roblox Safety Warnings Media preview

6 assets
Trend

User growth trend

Review user movement across collected snapshots.

User Growth Over Time

49K52K55K58K61K2026年7月19日2026年7月22日2026年7月25日Latest: 50K
Rating trend

7-day rating trend

View collected rating snapshots from the latest 7-day window to assess rating stability.

7-day rating change

Start
2.73
Latest
2.73
7-day rating change
0.00
2.722.722.732.732.732026年7月19日2026年7月22日2026年7月25日Latest: 2.73
2026年7月19日2026年7月25日
Growth overview

Daily, weekly, and monthly growth

Compare 1-day, 7-day, and 30-day net growth and growth rate.

1-day growthFlat
00%
7-day growthDeclining
-10K-16.7%
30-day growthFlat
00%
Technical snapshot

Version, languages, and crawl freshness

Review publication date, version, supported languages, and crawl timestamps.

Version2.15.0
ManifestV3
Size891KiB
Languages23Deutsch / English / Filipino +20
Published
Store updated
Last crawled
DeutschEnglishFilipinoIndonesiaMelayuNederlandsTiếng ViệtTürkçeespañolfrançaisitalianopolski
Overview

Product summary

Review the store description, core capabilities, and common use cases.

Know who you're talking to on Roblox.

Rotector displays safety indicators next to users across Roblox, showing potential risks before any interaction. Our system analyzes profiles, friend networks, group memberships, avatar outfits, and condo server activity to catch what traditional moderation misses.

Color-coded status indicators appear on user profiles throughout Roblox:

🟠 Flagged - Currently under review

🔴 Confirmed - Verified inappropriate behavior

🟡 Mixed - Concerning content but insufficient evidence

Reviews

Recent review snapshot

Inspect the latest comments and rating distribution.

Store average score2.7Chrome Web Store aggregate rating, including ratings without synced review text
Synced text average2.9Average computed only from synced review bodies below
Reviews with text262Synced review bodies
Total ratings / reviews367Chrome Web Store public rating/review count

Store average score: 2.7. The bars below are calculated from synced review text only, so they may be empty for extensions that have public ratings but no synced comments yet.

5
105
4
16
3
11
2
17
1
113
sleighbellss82026年4月23日
5

rotector works incredible and has helped me in moderating and keeping myself safe. dont trust the excess of bad reviews this extension is great

Version 2.15.1Language en
12 helpful · 48 not helpful
Wyatt2026年4月22日
5

gooners crying in the review section

Version 2.15.1Language en
20 helpful · 70 not helpful
tuff_boi2026年4月22日
2

The idea behind it is good. It gives users a simple way to be more cautious and aware of potentially unsafe behaviour. However, the system has some clear issues. It relies heavily on data without always considering context, which can lead to users being flagged in ways that feel unfair. There doesn’t seem to be a strong distinction between different levels of behaviour, meaning people can end up with similar labels despite very different situations. The appeal system is another downside. Response times can be quite long, and the process can feel unclear. In some cases, users are required to provide proof of ownership or supporting evidence, but even with logs or context, outcomes don’t always seem consistent. The pros and cons have a significant difference in amount. **Pros:** * Good concept focused on user safety * Simple and easy to understand * Encourages caution within the community * Does actually find out if you have been in those servers + games or clients * Can find out if your friend has been in condo servers (reach out to them before unfriending them though, UNLESS they are in like 10+ servers and are active 😭) **Cons:** * Relies too much on data without enough context * Limited distinction between levels of behaviour * Appeal responses take a VERY long time (months possibly, im still waiting for mine) * Decisions can feel unclear or inconsistent * Appeal process does take a very long time (I understand, small staff team, yes I know) * Too many false positives undealt with **Regarding minors (IMPORTANT):** * **Pros:** * Helps highlight potentially unsafe environments * Get to know if the people that you are speaking to could be potentially dangerous or a weird person * **Cons:** * Can flag younger users for curiosity or lack of judgement rather than intent * Does not always account for age or maturity * They could of been vigilantes or observers or trollers, looking around in the game (ONLY APPLIES TO SOME) * Some people may not have been placed in the mixed category, but instead be flagged as unsafe due to curiosity Overall, Rotector has a good idea behind it, but the execution could be improved. A better balance between data and context, along with a clearer and more responsive appeal process, would make it more reliable. Imo, if you do find any friend that has been flagged as unsafe or anything, don't instantly unfriend them, reach out to them first (if you can) EDIT: In my opinion, minors should be given a bit more leniency in the appeal system. A lot of the time, younger users might get flagged out of curiosity rather than bad intent, and being labelled as “unsafe” for that feels a bit harsh. There should be more consideration for age, and appeals for minors should be easier and more understanding in those situations. (im saying this because i have been flagged for the same reasons, I was 13, searching for these servers to see what is happening, and all i can say is that those servers are very disgusting and weird, and rotector does get a good job for catching those people, but the downsides overweigh the positive things this extension does.) edit 2: Yep 2 star now, appeals take outrageously long and its just false flagging lots of people now, its not doing its job. If you downvote this you just dont have any sympathy for victims or curious people

Version 2.17.0Language en
45 helpful · 5 not helpful
the one who knocks2026年4月22日
5

This extension awesome as hell bro like i can finally prove to my friends that one of the people they know plays condo but they didnt believe it

Version 2.15.1Language en
11 helpful · 27 not helpful
to toto2026年4月22日
5

All the people who criticise rotector saying they got false flagged are all gooners who want this extension gone lmao. This extension is super reliable and on point. If you join a condo server out of curiosity, that's on you. But you will get placed in the mixed category which means you are either innocent or a pred. So stop whining that you got flagged out of curiosity. The mixed section is a thing for a reason.

Version 2.15.1Language en
14 helpful · 43 not helpful
Dull Brad2026年4月22日
5

jaxron is lowk a cutie here at #DetectiveOkappiki we use his API to help catch gooners 🥰🥰🥰

Version 2.15.1Language en
12 helpful · 32 not helpful
Robniac (Robniac)2026年4月20日
1

Joe is an idiot.

Version 2.15.1Language en
20 helpful · 9 not helpful
NoName2026年4月16日
5

Thanks for protecting kids.

Version 2.15.1Language en
15 helpful · 40 not helpful
I_dk2026年4月15日
1

I got marked as being signed up on a condo website even though I literally never have like and cant even appeal

Version 2.15.1Language en
44 helpful · 10 not helpful
Wolf fox Fox2026年4月15日
1

don't trust the owner of rotector his a registered offender trying to "help" kids but the truth is he wants to gather their info and abuse them this whole rotector thing is a child explotation ring rubin sim is also a pedo who likes to draw 13 year olds on kiwi farms

Version 2.15.1Language en
47 helpful · 27 not helpful