paperGuard
On the paper search site, the SCI journal ranking is displayed
Displays rankings and h-index for academic journals next to Google Scholar search results.
Review user movement across collected snapshots.
View collected rating snapshots from the latest 7-day window to assess rating stability.
Compare 1-day, 7-day, and 30-day net growth and growth rate.
Review publication date, version, supported languages, and crawl timestamps.
Review the store description, core capabilities, and common use cases.
Rapid Quality Check for Academic Journals in Google Scholar Search Results
This Chrome extension displays an academic journal's (and some conference's) rankings next to search results from Google Scholar. This also works for scholar profile pages on Google Scholar and other subpages (e.g. cited by, etc.).
A variety of rankings are available for the user to choose from (SJR, ABDC, ABS, VHB, FT50, CORE, ...). These are interdisciplinary (e.g., SJR, BFI), focused on economics/social sciences (e.g., ABDC, VHB, ...), or focused on computer science journals/conferences (CORE, CCF).
Hovering your cursor over the ranking gives you additional information such as the name of the journal and its h-index. Clicking on the "+" (if available) gives you additional rankings; those that you have not pre-selected.
Via the extension's icon (which you can pin) you can also access a search bar to enter a journal name and get the ranking.
This extension uses/builds upon:
Inspect the latest comments and rating distribution.
Store average score: 4.2. The bars below are calculated from synced review text only, so they may be empty for extensions that have public ratings but no synced comments yet.
Review related products from the Chrome Web Store detail page.
On the paper search site, the SCI journal ranking is displayed
Your AI research assistant for understanding scientific literature.
Supercharge your paper reading: follow references, skim outline, jump to figures, cite and save.
Fast, convenient import of references and PDFs to your Mendeley Reference Manager library.
Scopus authenticated users can download PDF files directly from Scopus!
Calculates author self-citation rates on Google Scholar using DBLP, OpenCitation, and OpenAlex data.
It is showing personnel review - emerald journal in Q2 where as it is in Q1 and it has many glitches
Thank you for consolidating all the SJR (Scimago Journal & Country Rank) into a single venture. Your work is commendable! However, there are still several tasks to address, including fixing issues related to the ranking of non-ranked articles and ensuring proper hyperlinks between different articles. Recently, I noticed that the quick summary of articles categorized as % Q1, %Q2, %Q3, and N/A has disappeared. As a suggestion, instead of displaying ‘N/A,’ consider coding it as empty.
It make google scholar more valuable. Much helpful. How we can get summary of Q ranking papers of a researcher, like how much % Q1, how much % Q2 etc.
A useful tool for researchers.
ABDC List and SJR are still the old ones. Please update the journal latest ABDC list. Moreover, I see that getting on a list shows some quality over others. But, still showing a journal as red color (those that have a low ranking such as AJG 1, or ABDC - C, creates negative image of the journal which is unfair). Hence, the color scheme should be planned in a way that it does not create negative image of the journals that are already on the lists.
Scientific Journal Ranking is good but should based on WoS more. I saw the other ranking are for business, economic, and computer science. It will be more interesting if you add more ranking for engineering field. One more thing is Impact Factor adding.
It takes data from Scimago page where discontinued journals also showing Q1,Q2 quartiles and this also indicate same without verification.. not reliable for Scimago and Also there is no ranking for the Web of Science metrices ... use with cautions
Very good tool! However, it will be great to link it to the Scopus Journal Metrics as the are public too.
The current version is good as it can help recognize the quality of an article based on the rankings/quartiles. However, it would be great to also include WoS rankings.
Works. Charming.