Media Bias Fact Check
Show Media Bias / Fact Check ratings for Facebook and news websites as you browse
NewsGuard's rating shields and labels help users know which news and information websites to trust.
按已采集快照查看用户数变化。
展示最近 7 日窗口内已采集的评分快照,辅助判断近期评分是否稳定。
同口径展示 1 天、7 天、30 天的绝对增长与增长率。
查看发布时间、版本、支持语言、最近更新和抓取时间。
查看插件说明、主要功能和适用场景。
NewsGuard's reliability ratings for news and information sources help users make decisions about which news sources to trust—and avoid misinformation and disinformation.
Our ratings, scores, and Nutrition Labels for websites are displayed next to links on search engines and social media platforms and cover all the news websites accounting for 95% of online engagement.
Ratings are conducted by a team of experienced journalists using nine basic, apolitical journalistic criteria. Each site receives a trust score of 0-100, an overall rating level ranging from “High Credibility” to “Proceed with Caution,” and a thorough Nutrition Label report detailing the site’s ownership and financing, content, credibility practices, transparency practices, and history.
NewsGuard is for personal use only. Any commercial, research, or other non-personal use of NewsGuard is strictly prohibited by our Terms of Service: https://www.newsguardtech.com/terms-of-service/
查看最近评论和评分分布。
商店综合星级:3.6。下方星级分布只统计已同步评论正文;如果某个插件只有公开分数、没有真实评论正文,这里可能为空。
查看 Chrome 商店详情页中的相关产品。
Show Media Bias / Fact Check ratings for Facebook and news websites as you browse
The Official Wayback Machine Extension - by the Internet Archive.
Make Gmail simpler, more capable, and more respectful
Explore the web and lookup articles you find on Ground News
Find the bias of any news site you go to!
Applies decals or displays badges to a number of news media aggregators and individual media sources showing bias and acc data
I don't understand why would you want some org telling you who is creditable and who's not? News guard isn't
After researching, the credibility of this company is solid, it was founded by established and trusted journalists and continues to be endorsed by them. They use objective journalistic standards to judge the websites and for the most part they do a great job. It is affordably priced and easy to cancel after your free-trial. However, considering the level of influence they have, there is a lot that is left out and they don't seem to be held accountable by anything other than the pride of accredited journalists and the AP (which is hefty at least). This leaves a worrying amount of room for bias or manipulation which will hopefully be remedied, HOWEVER, thus far the ratings are very accurate and well substantiated and anyone saying otherwise is silly and doesn't know how to read... It's not a definitive good or bad, but it's certainly a very useful starting place considering all the fake news to sift through.
If you needed an indication of the reliability of this service, just look at the negative reviews. Note how extreme they are and the content of their complaints. Thanks to this site's transparency and objective criteria, Its pretty obvious these ham-fisted reviews are nothing but unprincipled, futile attempts to diminish Newsguard's brand.
Absolutely necessary in an era where SM algorithms select for outrage and sensationallism, and the manipulations of foreign governments acting in bad faith have degraded the public forum with bots promoting unsourced garbage. False allegations are routinely and successfully disguised as statements of fact, such that 3 in 10 americans still believe the result of the 2020 election was fraudulent. Recently Newsguard's nutrition guide saved me from wasting days parsing BS from Zerohedge.com. Yeah, it's subscription, something like $5/mo but well worth every penny.
I am actually impressed with Newsgaurd. Their reviews are detailed, reasonable, and very well sourced.
Great resource. DOn't believe the GOP misinformation about this
ZERO STARS, BIAS FAR LEFT LEANING PROPAGANDIST PUSHER WITH A PAYWALL! NO THANK YOU.
Extension is paywalled.
Excellent. Well done. We all need to develop a critical eye around misinformation and understand the impact.
Ho avuto modo di poter provare l'estensione. Molto utile per avere fin da subito un idea su come leggere una notizia. Leggendo le altre recensioni dimostra anche di essere molto cresciuta in questi anni, ampliando il suo database di testate giornalistiche e blog divulgativi, e di aver aumentato i dettagli delle valutazioni fatte. L'unica pecca, facilmente rimediabile, (forse è successo solamente a me) è l'attivazione dell'estensione macchinosa. Avevo difficoltà nell'accedere e successivamente era necessario riavviare il browser per poterla utilizzare.