Media Bias Fact Check
社交 / Social
Show Media Bias / Fact Check ratings for Facebook and news websites as you browse
用户数
7K
评分
4.6
评论数
82
7 天增长
0|0%
稳定信号未识别高风险权限组合
NewsGuard
NewsGuard's rating shields and labels help users know which news and information websites to trust.
用户数20K当前公开安装规模
评分3.6商店平均评分
评论数519公开评论体量
Manifest 版本V3插件平台版本
7日增长0近 7 天净增用户
7日增长率0%相对周增长速度
视觉预览
4 项素材NewsGuard 媒体预览
趋势
用户增长趋势
按已采集快照查看用户数变化。
用户增长趋势
评分趋势
近 7 日评分趋势
展示最近 7 日窗口内已采集的评分快照，辅助判断近期评分是否稳定。
7 日评分变化
起始值
3.59
最新值
3.59
7 日评分变化
0.00
2026年7月15日2026年7月21日
增长概览
日/周/月增长表现
同口径展示 1 天、7 天、30 天的绝对增长与增长率。
1日增长持平
00%7日增长持平
00%30日增长减少
-10K-33.3%技术摘要
版本、语言与抓取信息
查看发布时间、版本、支持语言、最近更新和抓取时间。
版本5.9.9
ManifestV3
大小1.57MiB
语言数1English
发布时间
最近更新
最近抓取
English
简介
插件简介
查看插件说明、主要功能和适用场景。
NewsGuard's reliability ratings for news and information sources help users make decisions about which news sources to trust—and avoid misinformation and disinformation.
Our ratings, scores, and Nutrition Labels for websites are displayed next to links on search engines and social media platforms and cover all the news websites accounting for 95% of online engagement.
Ratings are conducted by a team of experienced journalists using nine basic, apolitical journalistic criteria. Each site receives a trust score of 0-100, an overall rating level ranging from “High Credibility” to “Proceed with Caution,” and a thorough Nutrition Label report detailing the site’s ownership and financing, content, credibility practices, transparency practices, and history.
NewsGuard is for personal use only. Any commercial, research, or other non-personal use of NewsGuard is strictly prohibited by our Terms of Service: https://www.newsguardtech.com/terms-of-service/
评价
最新评论快照
查看最近评论和评分分布。
商店综合星级3.6Chrome 商店给出的聚合评分，包含只有打分但没有同步评论正文的情况
已同步评论均分3.3仅基于下方已同步评论正文计算
有内容评论346已同步的评论正文数量
总评分/评论数519Chrome 商店公开评分/评论计数
商店综合星级：3.6。下方星级分布只统计已同步评论正文；如果某个插件只有公开分数、没有真实评论正文，这里可能为空。
相关推荐
同类与相关插件
查看 Chrome 商店详情页中的相关产品。
Wayback Machine
工具 / Tools
The Official Wayback Machine Extension - by the Internet Archive.
用户数
300K
评分
4.3
评论数
333
7 天增长
0|0%
Simplify Gmail
工作流程与规划 / Workflow & Planning
免费增值置信度 64
Make Gmail simpler, more capable, and more respectful
用户数
40K
评分
4.5
评论数
626
7 天增长
0|0%
Ground News - Bias Checker
新闻与天气 / News & Weather
Explore the web and lookup articles you find on Ground News
用户数
40K
评分
4.0
评论数
64
7 天增长
0|0%
Bias Finder
新闻与天气 / News & Weather
Find the bias of any news site you go to!
用户数
2K
评分
4.2
评论数
21
7 天增长
+1K|100%
Stopaganda Plus
社交 / Social
疑似付费置信度 88平台 Braintree
Applies decals or displays badges to a number of news media aggregators and individual media sources showing bias and acc data
用户数
2K
评分
4.7
评论数
11
7 天增长
0|0%
Very useful.The Economist brought me here.
Great design, clear about methodology, reviewers I find to be trustworthy, sadly necessary.
Very handy to see who owns the news sites, and where they receive their funding.
it explains the ratings it gives and they always check out. I see it has "bias" against commentary and activism in favor of news, a bias i can live with.
This is a great extension. I've seen criticism that it's biased against conservative or right wing media, but those people cite Breitbart, Drudge, The Blaze. Uh, there's a reason for that, folks. And, it merely says "proceed with caution". Those sites do not practice sound journalistic integrity.
it works
With political bias against some new agency
It used to be alright, but now the nutrition label is behind a paywall. I can't justify this extension without and explanation for its ratings and im not going to pay for this.
This is a highly-biased service. It gives MSM high marks across the board. It does NOT allow for the fact that MSM outlets, all the way down to bottom-feeding Buzzfeed and the always-lying Media Matters, can get a story wrong, even on accident (though much is on purpose), and ANYONE calling out those stories will get the bad ratings from NewsGuard. You have to use your own brain, and keep thinking for yourself. Forget using a biased service. It will only lead you astray. Read all the viewpoints for yourself and figure out who is lying to you yourself.
Incredibly biased. They will give activist organizations that repeatedly go against their ethos a green checkmark. One example is Media Matters. They will also give a red exclamation mark against other websites that while not (no website is perfect to be honest), are certainly much, much better than other websites that do get a green checkmark such as the aforementioned Media Matters.