稳定信号未识别高风险权限组合
NewsGuard icon

NewsGuard

NewsGuard's rating shields and labels help users know which news and information websites to trust.

用户数20K当前公开安装规模
评分3.6商店平均评分
评论数519公开评论体量
Manifest 版本V3插件平台版本
7日增长0近 7 天净增用户
7日增长率0%相对周增长速度
视觉预览

NewsGuard 媒体预览

4 项素材
趋势

用户增长趋势

按已采集快照查看用户数变化。

用户增长趋势

20K20K20K20K20K2026年7月15日2026年7月18日2026年7月21日最新值: 20K
评分趋势

近 7 日评分趋势

展示最近 7 日窗口内已采集的评分快照,辅助判断近期评分是否稳定。

7 日评分变化

起始值
3.59
最新值
3.59
7 日评分变化
0.00
3.493.543.593.643.692026年7月15日2026年7月18日2026年7月21日最新值: 3.59
2026年7月15日2026年7月21日
增长概览

日/周/月增长表现

同口径展示 1 天、7 天、30 天的绝对增长与增长率。

1日增长持平
00%
7日增长持平
00%
30日增长减少
-10K-33.3%
技术摘要

版本、语言与抓取信息

查看发布时间、版本、支持语言、最近更新和抓取时间。

版本5.9.9
ManifestV3
大小1.57MiB
语言数1English
发布时间
最近更新
最近抓取
English
简介

插件简介

查看插件说明、主要功能和适用场景。

NewsGuard's reliability ratings for news and information sources help users make decisions about which news sources to trust—and avoid misinformation and disinformation.

Our ratings, scores, and Nutrition Labels for websites are displayed next to links on search engines and social media platforms and cover all the news websites accounting for 95% of online engagement.

Ratings are conducted by a team of experienced journalists using nine basic, apolitical journalistic criteria. Each site receives a trust score of 0-100, an overall rating level ranging from “High Credibility” to “Proceed with Caution,” and a thorough Nutrition Label report detailing the site’s ownership and financing, content, credibility practices, transparency practices, and history.

NewsGuard is for personal use only. Any commercial, research, or other non-personal use of NewsGuard is strictly prohibited by our Terms of Service: https://www.newsguardtech.com/terms-of-service/

评价

最新评论快照

查看最近评论和评分分布。

商店综合星级3.6Chrome 商店给出的聚合评分,包含只有打分但没有同步评论正文的情况
已同步评论均分3.3仅基于下方已同步评论正文计算
有内容评论346已同步的评论正文数量
总评分/评论数519Chrome 商店公开评分/评论计数

商店综合星级:3.6。下方星级分布只统计已同步评论正文;如果某个插件只有公开分数、没有真实评论正文,这里可能为空。

5
161
4
36
3
13
2
21
1
115
W. Scott Meeks2020年3月17日
5

I particularly like the integration with Facebook and the transparency in how the ratings are calculated. You can drill down to see exactly what the nine criteria are and why a particular site was given the score it was.

语言 en
4 有用 · 1 无用
DWS2020年3月17日
4

O.k., elephant in the room. Yes, right-wing media has more 'misleading' titles and use charged words. However, Buzzfeed and Vox are literally just as bad. So is this app bias? Well, yes, in that it allows a more accurate assessment of right-wing media vs. left-wing media... at times. The main strong news sources are rated fairly accurately. The real bias exists in that it doesn't treat both extremes equally. You will find more reputable news on the left, it's simply a byproduct of the nature of right leaning sources gearing news as more inflammatory and agitated. However, they do not look for those same elements when they are being used in turn by SOME left-leaning (usually hard leans) on the other side. Bias, but still MOSTLY fair.

语言 en
3 有用 · 1 无用
Patricia Howard2020年3月17日
4

I have been using news guard for several months and like the concept of rating reliability for news reporting. It saves time as I can bypass articles that do not satisfy the criteria set up by news guard.

语言 en
4 有用 · 2 无用
Steve Berczuk2020年3月17日
5

A great sanity check on news sources. While you may doubt the overall rating for some sites, you can always drill down and see the report card and evaluate for yourself. Especially useful for sites you aren't familiar with.

语言 en
4 有用 · 1 无用
Lori Ayre2020年3月17日
5

Very thoughtful evaluation of self-described newsites. Some may quibble with the specifics of each rating but the analysis of each site is balanced. I'd like to see more gradations in the color coding to reflect the gradations of the scores themselves.

语言 en
3 有用 · 1 无用
Gary Thexton2020年3月17日
5

Every competitive endeavor needs an arbiter. Whether it is in a national election, or a courtroom trial, or a tennis court, or a chess match. Of course the judges are human, with all the complexities that go with that. But most arbiters try VERY hard to be objective, and take pride in the fairness they bring to the competition. NewsGuard is there at the top with the very best. They lean in to the wind of adversity, and take the high road to fairness. Trust is earned. They have mine.

语言 en
4 有用 · 1 无用
asdf Duisbug2020年3月17日
5

Das einzig richtige Konzept! Wer eine "Eierlegende Wollmilchsau" erwartet, wird mit seinen erhöhten Erwartungen nur unzufrieden sein. Bei Unzufriedenheit, weil fehlerhaft oder so, kann ja jeder auch mit NewsGuard kommunizieren. Alles andere ist "pure" Meinungsfreiheit, bei der es weniger um fundierte Meinungsmitteilung und ggfs. Diskussion geht als um Stimmungsmache.

语言 de
1 有用 · 0 无用
Chris Clark2020年3月17日
4

I am a subscriber. I like the way NewsGuard encourages me to read round topics and challenges an inherent laziness to do so. I also like, really like, their rating table though was disappointed that they buckled under the Daily Mail's legal-backed threat when that was initially adversely rated.

语言 en
4 有用 · 1 无用
Alex Thompson2020年3月17日
5

Easy to Use once installed. Grade cards for news sources, even in social media feeds, are easy to understand and useful in a time of an exploding number of 'news' sources and sensationalist headlines.

语言 en
3 有用 · 1 无用
Mary Deming Barber2020年3月17日
5

My profession, strategic communications, relies on facts. They are a cornerstone of what we do today more that ever before. It is wonderful to have NewsGuard in my corner as I can easily assess whether a source is fact, fiction or just plain unknown. It allows me to easily and effectively counsel my clients.

语言 en
3 有用 · 1 无用