稳定信号未识别高风险权限组合
NewsGuard icon

NewsGuard

NewsGuard's rating shields and labels help users know which news and information websites to trust.

用户数20K当前公开安装规模
评分3.6商店平均评分
评论数519公开评论体量
Manifest 版本V3插件平台版本
7日增长0近 7 天净增用户
7日增长率0%相对周增长速度
视觉预览

NewsGuard 媒体预览

4 项素材
趋势

用户增长趋势

按已采集快照查看用户数变化。

用户增长趋势

20K20K20K20K20K2026年7月15日2026年7月18日2026年7月21日最新值: 20K
评分趋势

近 7 日评分趋势

展示最近 7 日窗口内已采集的评分快照,辅助判断近期评分是否稳定。

7 日评分变化

起始值
3.59
最新值
3.59
7 日评分变化
0.00
3.493.543.593.643.692026年7月15日2026年7月18日2026年7月21日最新值: 3.59
2026年7月15日2026年7月21日
增长概览

日/周/月增长表现

同口径展示 1 天、7 天、30 天的绝对增长与增长率。

1日增长持平
00%
7日增长持平
00%
30日增长减少
-10K-33.3%
技术摘要

版本、语言与抓取信息

查看发布时间、版本、支持语言、最近更新和抓取时间。

版本5.9.9
ManifestV3
大小1.57MiB
语言数1English
发布时间
最近更新
最近抓取
English
简介

插件简介

查看插件说明、主要功能和适用场景。

NewsGuard's reliability ratings for news and information sources help users make decisions about which news sources to trust—and avoid misinformation and disinformation.

Our ratings, scores, and Nutrition Labels for websites are displayed next to links on search engines and social media platforms and cover all the news websites accounting for 95% of online engagement.

Ratings are conducted by a team of experienced journalists using nine basic, apolitical journalistic criteria. Each site receives a trust score of 0-100, an overall rating level ranging from “High Credibility” to “Proceed with Caution,” and a thorough Nutrition Label report detailing the site’s ownership and financing, content, credibility practices, transparency practices, and history.

NewsGuard is for personal use only. Any commercial, research, or other non-personal use of NewsGuard is strictly prohibited by our Terms of Service: https://www.newsguardtech.com/terms-of-service/

评价

最新评论快照

查看最近评论和评分分布。

商店综合星级3.6Chrome 商店给出的聚合评分,包含只有打分但没有同步评论正文的情况
已同步评论均分3.3仅基于下方已同步评论正文计算
有内容评论346已同步的评论正文数量
总评分/评论数519Chrome 商店公开评分/评论计数

商店综合星级:3.6。下方星级分布只统计已同步评论正文;如果某个插件只有公开分数、没有真实评论正文,这里可能为空。

5
161
4
36
3
13
2
21
1
115
Seth Richmond2020年3月17日
5

It's so easy to believe sources that agree with your viewpoint. It's so easy to label anything that challenges your viewpoint as fake news. It's normal. It's natural. We all do it. How can we ever find agreement if we trust different news sources with opposite spins on the same information. These journalists created a list of objective criteria and compare every site to the same list of objective criteria. This isn't about agreeing with their ratings, it's about analyzing their objective measurements and challenging your biased bubble. Grow up and truly challenge the news sources you trust. Challenge this extension, read what they have to say. This is exactly what we need right now.

语言 en
3 有用 · 2 无用
Simon Mundy2020年3月17日
4

Usually pretty reliable. I'm hoping scope and coverage will increase over time. Huge job of course.

语言 en
3 有用 · 1 无用
Md Ehsanul Haque (Ehsan)2020年3月17日
5

NewsGuard has been a great help for me to establish what is the right source of information. Not only that, it helped me to debunked many of the information shared by others. Although I may not ever rely fully on it, but this has been a great added indicator.

语言 en
2 有用 · 1 无用
Kate Savage2020年3月17日
5

I heard about this extension after watching a course from The Great courses called Fighting Misinformation: Digital Media Literacy. I find this very useful for both medical and news. If your favorite source is having issues with the rate system, forward the report to see if they will make changes such as disclose ownership information or posting corrections.

语言 en
4 有用 · 1 无用
William Carlin2020年3月17日
5

I find this app or extension very accurate and unbiased. The explanations a offered in the complete "nutrional label" arer exact and fact based. Well worth the cost. I think people who berated this app due to its "bias" don't' understand the word what the word "bias" means. A studied result that may be unfavorable is not a "bias," it is a honest evaluation. This app is so helpful I recomend it to everyone.

语言 en
3 有用 · 1 无用
Nick Penniman2020年3月17日
5

Very useful for research purposes. Identifies invalid web sites and saves lots of time.

语言 en
3 有用 · 1 无用
Chris Ahearn2020年3月17日
5

I believe that the team is doing the online world a ton of good. People may disagree at the margins - but I find their nutrition guides to be clear and transparent. I've seen some of the negative reviews (and the positive ones). We as humans want to be reassured that what we believe is the definitive view of the truth - and it hurts us when that is questioned. Understanding journalistic standards matters because much activism is presented as definitive truths. It isn't help on either side of the divide and I believe NewsGuard helps expose non-transparent behavior.

语言 en
3 有用 · 1 无用
Radu Coman2020年3月17日
5

Newsguard makes news sites so much more transparent by providing relevant information about the way they gather information and do business. It's very helpful.

语言 en
4 有用 · 1 无用
Bernard Schuman2020年3月17日
5

It is a valued tool for recognizing which media outlets make an effort to provide objective, factual news reports. For each media outlet, NewsGuard provides the ranking categories and metrics that help define the final rating. It will never override knee-jerk reactions of those bent to some favorite source that simply preaches to the choir (whether MSNBC, Breitbart, or Drudge, et. al.) but overall it does a good job defining which media are more trustworthy.

语言 en
2 有用 · 1 无用
Samuele Manfrin2020年3月17日
5

Il fatto di poter avere dettagli su quanto un sito sia trasparente offre di per sè la possibilità di provvedere a valuatare autonomamente l'affidabilità dei contenuti proposti. Il fatto che la valutazione si basi su parametri oggettivi è garanzia della bassa manipolabilità dei risultati mostrati, e per questo reputo quest'app affidabile, così come lodevole il lavoro di chi ci sta dietro. Peccato per le valutazioni negative fatte per motivi personali, da parte di chi non accetta che il proprio sito di riferimento non possa essere considerato affidabile secondo criteri oggettivi, ma questo è il limite proprio delle persone che a tali siti si appoggiano: analfabetismo funzionale e scarsa capacità di analisi.

语言 it
2 有用 · 0 无用