稳定信号未识别高风险权限组合

NewsGuard

NewsGuard's rating shields and labels help users know which news and information websites to trust.

用户数20K当前公开安装规模

评分3.6商店平均评分

评论数519公开评论体量

Manifest 版本V3插件平台版本

7日增长0近 7 天净增用户

7日增长率0%相对周增长速度

视觉预览

NewsGuard 媒体预览

4 项素材

趋势

用户增长趋势

按已采集快照查看用户数变化。

用户增长趋势

评分趋势

近 7 日评分趋势

展示最近 7 日窗口内已采集的评分快照，辅助判断近期评分是否稳定。

7 日评分变化

起始值

3.59

日/周/月增长表现

同口径展示 1 天、7 天、30 天的绝对增长与增长率。

1日增长持平

00%

7日增长持平

00%

30日增长减少

-10K-33.3%

技术摘要

版本、语言与抓取信息

查看发布时间、版本、支持语言、最近更新和抓取时间。

版本5.9.9

ManifestV3

大小1.57MiB

语言数1English

发布时间--

插件简介

查看插件说明、主要功能和适用场景。

NewsGuard's reliability ratings for news and information sources help users make decisions about which news sources to trust—and avoid misinformation and disinformation.

Our ratings, scores, and Nutrition Labels for websites are displayed next to links on search engines and social media platforms and cover all the news websites accounting for 95% of online engagement.

Ratings are conducted by a team of experienced journalists using nine basic, apolitical journalistic criteria. Each site receives a trust score of 0-100, an overall rating level ranging from “High Credibility” to “Proceed with Caution,” and a thorough Nutrition Label report detailing the site’s ownership and financing, content, credibility practices, transparency practices, and history.

NewsGuard is for personal use only. Any commercial, research, or other non-personal use of NewsGuard is strictly prohibited by our Terms of Service: https://www.newsguardtech.com/terms-of-service/

评价

最新评论快照

查看最近评论和评分分布。

商店综合星级3.6Chrome 商店给出的聚合评分，包含只有打分但没有同步评论正文的情况

已同步评论均分3.3仅基于下方已同步评论正文计算

有内容评论346已同步的评论正文数量

总评分/评论数519Chrome 商店公开评分/评论计数

商店综合星级：3.6。下方星级分布只统计已同步评论正文；如果某个插件只有公开分数、没有真实评论正文，这里可能为空。

5★

161

4★

3★

2★

1★

115

Hannah B.2018年11月29日

Extremely useful! I especially appreciate Newsguards' prioritization of clear standards for journalistic rigor and ethics - news sites are measured against the standards of their profession, not against the ideologies of their users.

Matt Skibinski2018年11月29日

I'm a bit biased, but I love NewsGuard!

匿名用户2018年11月29日

What a great extension. I was a little skeptical because I've tried similar services but they only had the really big recognizable brands (NYT, CNN, Fox, etc.) and honestly what's the point of that? Everyone already has an opinion about how trustworthy those are. But this app has thousands of news sites on it including tons of local publications and more obsure online publications. And I like that they use specific criteria for their ratings and show the results tranparently. Way better than crowd sourcing it or any other way I've seen.

Grant Stern2018年11月21日

This is a biased news ratings plugin designed to decry perspective in journalism. The plugin itself is invasive and makes page load times sluggish. The simplistic red/green setup belies the utter waste of time it takes to get rated by NewsGuard, which means that it's a plugin no more useful than the hysteria lists from late 2016 which a few academics published to blacklist news websites that are not corporate. What's the point of creating an elaborate 9 point scale, when the plugin is little more than an opinion website itself. Downgrading a site to red because it has never had to make a correction is the height of insane literalism, but they do it. NewsGuard's criterion or reviewers cannot tell the difference between newsmaking interviews from people involved in current events and opinion stories. In one case, NewsGuard literally picked a single 2 year old tweet, which was deleted, as a basis for downgrading a website started over 18 months later. NewsGuard has a heavy bias towards absolute literalism that is inappropriate for understanding politics, which is not math. This is a useless plugin, which is too bad because the web needs a nuanced and intelligent product like this one, but it is dependent on the opinion of the people in charge, who don't believe they're biased, which is a shame, so I am uninstalling it. STILL INACCURATE: WON'T CORRECT OWN FALSE REPORTING, EVEN WHEN MAINSTREAM NEWS REPORTS THINGS ACCURATELY. YOU HAVE TO BEG THEM JUST TO CORRECT THEIR OWN BAD WORK. EVEN WORSE THEY CHARGE YOU TO SEE YOUR RATING. THIS IS TAKING WEBSITE EVALUATION TO THE LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR.

匿名用户2018年11月20日

I have looked at their ratings and it seems to be pretty left leaning. Not sure I can trust it. CNN got 9 out of nine. That dont seem right????? Their going to have to do better than this.

Dave Campbell2018年11月17日

Highly biased, and its evaluations are performed by only a small number of so-called "journalists". Of over 40 sites I selected, every known liberal biased site was given a "green" indication but not identified as liberal or left leaning. Conversely every conservative site was given a "red" indication, immediately identified as being "conservative" biased except for Fox News and two or three others. CNN was highly praised as the cream of the crop, truthful at all times and never presenting opinion as fact. This has been proven beyond any doubt to be untrue. If you value the truth do your own research and stay away from this obvious propaganda tool.

Alan Tucker2018年10月18日

I think this extension could be very good at weeding out false news and news from dubious sources but it needs more people using it and crowd sourcing for rating articles like WoT has for rating sites. You shouldn't rely on this extension to tell you what sites to get your news from though, all it is trying to do is allow people to make informed decisions on what sources to get their news from.