Media Bias Fact Check
Social
Show Media Bias / Fact Check ratings for Facebook and news websites as you browse
Users
7K
Rating
4.6
Reviews
82
7D Growth
0|0%
Stable signalUnknownHigh-risk permissions
NewsGuard
NewsGuard's rating shields and labels help users know which news and information websites to trust.
Users20KCurrent public install base
Rating3.6Store average score
Reviews519Public review volume
Manifest versionV3Extension platform version
7-day growth0Net users gained this week
7-day growth rate0%Relative weekly velocity
Preview
4 assetsNewsGuard Media preview
Trend
User growth trend
Review user movement across collected snapshots.
User Growth Over Time
Rating trend
7-day rating trend
View collected rating snapshots from the latest 7-day window to assess rating stability.
7-day rating change
Start
3.59
Latest
3.59
7-day rating change
0.00
2026年7月15日2026年7月21日
Growth overview
Daily, weekly, and monthly growth
Compare 1-day, 7-day, and 30-day net growth and growth rate.
1-day growthFlat
00%7-day growthFlat
00%30-day growthDeclining
-10K-33.3%Technical snapshot
Version, languages, and crawl freshness
Review publication date, version, supported languages, and crawl timestamps.
Version5.9.9
ManifestV3
Size1.57MiB
Languages1English
Published
Store updated
Last crawled
English
Overview
Product summary
Review the store description, core capabilities, and common use cases.
NewsGuard's reliability ratings for news and information sources help users make decisions about which news sources to trust—and avoid misinformation and disinformation.
Our ratings, scores, and Nutrition Labels for websites are displayed next to links on search engines and social media platforms and cover all the news websites accounting for 95% of online engagement.
Ratings are conducted by a team of experienced journalists using nine basic, apolitical journalistic criteria. Each site receives a trust score of 0-100, an overall rating level ranging from “High Credibility” to “Proceed with Caution,” and a thorough Nutrition Label report detailing the site’s ownership and financing, content, credibility practices, transparency practices, and history.
NewsGuard is for personal use only. Any commercial, research, or other non-personal use of NewsGuard is strictly prohibited by our Terms of Service: https://www.newsguardtech.com/terms-of-service/
Reviews
Recent review snapshot
Inspect the latest comments and rating distribution.
Store average score3.6Chrome Web Store aggregate rating, including ratings without synced review text
Synced text average3.3Average computed only from synced review bodies below
Reviews with text346Synced review bodies
Total ratings / reviews519Chrome Web Store public rating/review count
Store average score: 3.6. The bars below are calculated from synced review text only, so they may be empty for extensions that have public ratings but no synced comments yet.
Related products
Similar and related extensions
Review related products from the Chrome Web Store detail page.
Wayback Machine
Tools
The Official Wayback Machine Extension - by the Internet Archive.
Users
300K
Rating
4.3
Reviews
333
7D Growth
0|0%
Simplify Gmail
Workflow & Planning
FreemiumConfidence 64
Make Gmail simpler, more capable, and more respectful
Users
40K
Rating
4.5
Reviews
626
7D Growth
0|0%
Ground News - Bias Checker
News & Weather
Explore the web and lookup articles you find on Ground News
Users
40K
Rating
4.0
Reviews
64
7D Growth
0|0%
Bias Finder
News & Weather
Find the bias of any news site you go to!
Users
2K
Rating
4.2
Reviews
21
7D Growth
+1K|100%
Stopaganda Plus
Social
Likely PaidConfidence 88Platform Braintree
Applies decals or displays badges to a number of news media aggregators and individual media sources showing bias and acc data
Users
2K
Rating
4.7
Reviews
11
7D Growth
0|0%
This is a wonderful extension, it helps me pick reliable news sources, so I know I am getting a fair and balanced information. Especially on Facebook!
Simple and easy to use.
Love this tool, it helps me check bias and weigh news. It's not perfect, but its improving every day.
It's fine for me but common sense is often better. It's good for those new to the internet
This is a great source. I use it with my journalism students to teach media literacy. I am disappointed by all the 1 star reviews by people with low media literacy. There's a lot of cognitive dissonance going on in these reviews here. Goodness. Let me ask you this -- if they were truly biased in favor of the liberal media, why is Fox News (technically) rated green? Sheesh. Also, the 9 standards of credibility listed on their website say nothing about whether a news source is liberal or conservative. Maybe some people are just bitter that the news site that confirms all their suspicions isn't actually as credible -- or evidence-based -- as they thought...
Great in-depth analysis.
Great. When source is listed as invalid you can check why is that, so all those people saying here it is propaganda are wrong.
Many complain about "Fake News" still coming through. Which is only partially true because most fake news sites are filtered out. You should also be weary about the political alignment of the corperation behind it, Microsoft being a american multi billion corporation many have complained about the bad ratings of right leaning news outlets and others have complained about the bad ratings of non western news outlets like Sputnik, RT, and the good ratings of websites like The Sun or the German equivalent Die Bild, which published fake news in the past and don't follow basic journalistic standards, which, again, is very understandable. Overall a handy tool to have to help you double check information and to make researching easier, even if by far not all news sites are registered in their data banks and you still shouldn't trust them blindly.
Great extension! Super nice to know whether the site I'm reading is legit.
Un'estensione utile per capire cosa sta dietro ai siti di news. Non bisogna limitarsi a leggere il «foglietto illustrativo» ma, per capire bene cosa si sta leggendo, è utile approfondire con l'«etichetta nutrizionale completa», dove si possono trovare informazioni approfondite sugli assetti proprietari, esempi di fake news, linea editoriale, etc. Secondo me è un ottimo lavoro, ovviamente non esente da critiche come accade sempre quando si esprimono opinioni (ad esempio, è giudicato attendibile un sito come il Daily Mail); tuttavia qui si cerca di essere il più oggettivi possibili.