稳定信号未识别高风险权限组合
NewsGuard icon

NewsGuard

NewsGuard's rating shields and labels help users know which news and information websites to trust.

用户数20K当前公开安装规模
评分3.6商店平均评分
评论数519公开评论体量
Manifest 版本V3插件平台版本
7日增长0近 7 天净增用户
7日增长率0%相对周增长速度
视觉预览

NewsGuard 媒体预览

4 项素材
趋势

用户增长趋势

按已采集快照查看用户数变化。

用户增长趋势

20K20K20K20K20K2026年7月15日2026年7月18日2026年7月21日最新值: 20K
评分趋势

近 7 日评分趋势

展示最近 7 日窗口内已采集的评分快照,辅助判断近期评分是否稳定。

7 日评分变化

起始值
3.59
最新值
3.59
7 日评分变化
0.00
3.493.543.593.643.692026年7月15日2026年7月18日2026年7月21日最新值: 3.59
2026年7月15日2026年7月21日
增长概览

日/周/月增长表现

同口径展示 1 天、7 天、30 天的绝对增长与增长率。

1日增长持平
00%
7日增长持平
00%
30日增长减少
-10K-33.3%
技术摘要

版本、语言与抓取信息

查看发布时间、版本、支持语言、最近更新和抓取时间。

版本5.9.9
ManifestV3
大小1.57MiB
语言数1English
发布时间
最近更新
最近抓取
English
简介

插件简介

查看插件说明、主要功能和适用场景。

NewsGuard's reliability ratings for news and information sources help users make decisions about which news sources to trust—and avoid misinformation and disinformation.

Our ratings, scores, and Nutrition Labels for websites are displayed next to links on search engines and social media platforms and cover all the news websites accounting for 95% of online engagement.

Ratings are conducted by a team of experienced journalists using nine basic, apolitical journalistic criteria. Each site receives a trust score of 0-100, an overall rating level ranging from “High Credibility” to “Proceed with Caution,” and a thorough Nutrition Label report detailing the site’s ownership and financing, content, credibility practices, transparency practices, and history.

NewsGuard is for personal use only. Any commercial, research, or other non-personal use of NewsGuard is strictly prohibited by our Terms of Service: https://www.newsguardtech.com/terms-of-service/

评价

最新评论快照

查看最近评论和评分分布。

商店综合星级3.6Chrome 商店给出的聚合评分,包含只有打分但没有同步评论正文的情况
已同步评论均分3.3仅基于下方已同步评论正文计算
有内容评论346已同步的评论正文数量
总评分/评论数519Chrome 商店公开评分/评论计数

商店综合星级:3.6。下方星级分布只统计已同步评论正文;如果某个插件只有公开分数、没有真实评论正文,这里可能为空。

5
161
4
36
3
13
2
21
1
115
linxi les2020年2月15日
1

原先的免费模式被完全废弃,现在全面转为收费订阅制了,我可以接受高级功能付费,但无法接受借助免费用户起家后转为彻底的收费模式,一星送上,拜拜

语言 zh
2 有用 · 0 无用
W Odin2020年2月13日
5

Great app, has a very good rating system that is applied fairly across the board. I am a faithful NPR reader but have been wanting to find a reputable conservative news source and this site helped me find some great ones that live up to rating that NewGuard gave them. Highly recommend in the era of hype, misinformation, and opinion/conspiracy presented as fact.

语言 en
5 有用 · 1 无用
Elldallan Reechani2020年2月12日
1

Suckers in reviews and then switches to an entirely paid subscriptionbased model where the free users who helped build the reputation is completely locked out. So yeah you get a 1 star from me. The app itself pre pay to play was pretty good though.

语言 en
4 有用 · 3 无用
Charles Kinnan2020年2月12日
5

This application does a great job of separating sites that misrepresent facts from those that don't. Sites that tell the facts straight get a green light. Those that spread lies get a red light. This still leaves A LOT of room for interpretation. Fox gets a green light, and I continue to read Fox, but I disagree strongly with so many of their interpretations. This distinction is where so many of these reviews fall down. People are rating the application poorly because their favorite sites, those that publish interpretations they agree with, are flagged red. However, no one needs to make decisions or arguments based on outright lies. Facts don't always lead to the same conclusions depending on how people weigh the different issues at stake. And only after we agree on the facts can we have meaningful conversations about our different values. Good job staking out the common ground!

语言 en
4 有用 · 0 无用
Thomas Palermo Maione2020年2月10日
5

they gain my trust by being fully transparent on the criteria they use for their rating. It also very convenient.

语言 en
2 有用 · 0 无用
Adam Stillman2020年2月9日
3

Charging a fee to deliver your service seems like it may drive away consumers, I suggest a donation based model, since you're providing 'real news.'

语言 en
1 有用 · 2 无用
Hugo Bergevald2020年2月9日
5

Just what I was looking for as a media student

语言 en
2 有用 · 0 无用
Yasmin P. F.2020年2月8日
1

They say they can help discern what is true from what isn't, yet all the news sites they mark as 'green', or truthful seem to be the less truthful around. And the worst thing is that they're marking the most truthful as 'fake news'. This means that they aren't what they claim. What they are is probably more like a propaganda watchdog trying to control the access to real information on the internet.

语言 en
0 有用 · 5 无用
Cathy Coffinger2020年2月6日
5

I love this app and have used it for a while. I like the fact that sites cannot hide their questionable practices. Some people are saying that it is bias against conservative sites but the Nutrition label is very clear on what they check for. Things like "does not repeatedly publish false content", "regularly corrects or clarifies errors" and "website discloses ownership and financing" are objective criteria. Keep up the good work and I will keep up my subscription.

语言 en
3 有用 · 0 无用
Ben2020年2月5日
4

It's great and an important tool to have in the digital era. For many reviews saying it's biased, just read the company's own description in how it is funded and run by conservatives and liberals to make news better for both sides.

语言 en
3 有用 · 0 无用