稳定信号未识别高风险权限组合
NewsGuard icon

NewsGuard

NewsGuard's rating shields and labels help users know which news and information websites to trust.

用户数20K当前公开安装规模
评分3.6商店平均评分
评论数519公开评论体量
Manifest 版本V3插件平台版本
7日增长0近 7 天净增用户
7日增长率0%相对周增长速度
视觉预览

NewsGuard 媒体预览

4 项素材
趋势

用户增长趋势

按已采集快照查看用户数变化。

用户增长趋势

20K20K20K20K20K2026年7月15日2026年7月18日2026年7月21日最新值: 20K
评分趋势

近 7 日评分趋势

展示最近 7 日窗口内已采集的评分快照,辅助判断近期评分是否稳定。

7 日评分变化

起始值
3.59
最新值
3.59
7 日评分变化
0.00
3.493.543.593.643.692026年7月15日2026年7月18日2026年7月21日最新值: 3.59
2026年7月15日2026年7月21日
增长概览

日/周/月增长表现

同口径展示 1 天、7 天、30 天的绝对增长与增长率。

1日增长持平
00%
7日增长持平
00%
30日增长减少
-10K-33.3%
技术摘要

版本、语言与抓取信息

查看发布时间、版本、支持语言、最近更新和抓取时间。

版本5.9.9
ManifestV3
大小1.57MiB
语言数1English
发布时间
最近更新
最近抓取
English
简介

插件简介

查看插件说明、主要功能和适用场景。

NewsGuard's reliability ratings for news and information sources help users make decisions about which news sources to trust—and avoid misinformation and disinformation.

Our ratings, scores, and Nutrition Labels for websites are displayed next to links on search engines and social media platforms and cover all the news websites accounting for 95% of online engagement.

Ratings are conducted by a team of experienced journalists using nine basic, apolitical journalistic criteria. Each site receives a trust score of 0-100, an overall rating level ranging from “High Credibility” to “Proceed with Caution,” and a thorough Nutrition Label report detailing the site’s ownership and financing, content, credibility practices, transparency practices, and history.

NewsGuard is for personal use only. Any commercial, research, or other non-personal use of NewsGuard is strictly prohibited by our Terms of Service: https://www.newsguardtech.com/terms-of-service/

评价

最新评论快照

查看最近评论和评分分布。

商店综合星级3.6Chrome 商店给出的聚合评分,包含只有打分但没有同步评论正文的情况
已同步评论均分3.3仅基于下方已同步评论正文计算
有内容评论346已同步的评论正文数量
总评分/评论数519Chrome 商店公开评分/评论计数

商店综合星级:3.6。下方星级分布只统计已同步评论正文;如果某个插件只有公开分数、没有真实评论正文,这里可能为空。

5
161
4
36
3
13
2
21
1
115
J M2020年1月22日
5

Excellent concept and useful tool. I would give it 4.5 stars or 4 stars only because many of the news organizations I am interested in are not rated yet. These are very often little news sites, or foreign sites with little American or British readership. That said I give it 5 stars because of the extremist that are, well extremely bias. I have seen various news sites that are liberal with Red shields (that is over all failing grade) and conservative media with Green shield (that is passing grade), and satire is marked with an orange shield. The extremist below hate the fact that their favorite very extreme news site often failed to meet many of the standards of good journalism. Bias reporting has nothing to do with it. Each news site is judged on false content, presenting information responsibly, corrects errors, handles opinions and new responsibly, avoids deceptive headlines, discloses ownership/financing, labels advertising, reveals management/conflicts of interest, and provides the names of content creators with biographical information. A news site does not need to pass all of these marks to be judged 'good'. It also gives a brief view on the news sites standards and transparency. Also is a section about the news site. It will clearly state if the organization is liberal, conservative, or moderate, with some additional information that can be helpful. Last is a link "full Nutrition Label" that will give a fairly in-depth view on why each category was rated with a green or red mark, history about the news site, and more. Along with many links supporting their decision, and even a feedback link. Before I get lambasted by the right wing haters. Take the three largest news groups, CNN, Fox, and MSNBC. All pass the general standards. CNN has one red X, Fox two, and MSNBC three. It clearly labels MSNBC as liberal, and Fox as conservative. CNN s not label by NewGuard in a political spectrum. I might add, I have hear many of the extreme right wingers start calling Fox News a liberal reporting agency. So. There you have it. I have not seen NewGuard label any organization as libertarian, green, socialize, fascist, or the like. Only liberal, conservative or no label at all. They do update the ratings. I have seen this more than once. Both for liberal and conservative sites, either as the site improves the quality of journalism and disclosure or as the site sinks into cloudy murk.

语言 en
4 有用 · 1 无用
Scott Morrison2020年1月21日
2

Operates well but lies about the news organizations it evaluates.

语言 en
1 有用 · 3 无用
Saved Sinner2020年1月20日
4

While the ratings can be biased / misleading, it is better than not having any idea of the veracity of what you read on the internet. No rating system is perfect, but you read their rationale behind each if you so desire.

语言 en
3 有用 · 0 无用
Connor Rasmussen2020年1月18日
5

i think this is good work, important, and necessary. the internet information deluge could use some landmarks. and News Guard is helping with that.

语言 en
4 有用 · 0 无用
Shaun Carlson2020年1月17日
5

This tool makes it a lot easier to judge how much a story from a source needs to be validated before believing it. Like any tool, it's not perfect, but it's a lot easier than flying blind or relying solely on my own biases. It's a nice gut check.

语言 en
2 有用 · 0 无用
Arthur Jin2020年1月17日
4

It works on the major news sites and info sites, however the smaller, more minor ones don't have any kind of rating at all.

语言 en
3 有用 · 0 无用
Dragonite Spam2020年1月16日
5

I use it mostly to identify The Onion knockoffs that do the bare minimum to disclose themselves, which it seems to be doing a good job of. To everyone who's observed that a number of the conservative outlets like Breitbart and whatever are getting marked red - yes, that's the point exactly. You shouldn't even need this extension to know that.

语言 en
2 有用 · 0 无用
Search Recon (Search Recon)2020年1月11日
2

Great concept, but they are biased which isn't what i'm looking for. They are very left leaning and verify actually false news like on CNN and TheDailyBeast. While I am left leaning myself I try to read all sources and create my own opinion. But when they trash the dailywire for a true, but opinionated peace and dont when the dailybeast publishes actual fake news it's ridiculous. Cant get away from leftism bias even when I try.

语言 en
0 有用 · 3 无用
Brandon Baggett2020年1月9日
4

Easy to use quick reference to test the validity of sites. The metrics that Newsguard uses are slightly incomplete so I wouldn't use it as the defining source of evaluating the credibility of every website, but it is a great superficial look at what certain sites contain.

语言 en
3 有用 · 0 无用
Stephan Lattka2020年1月9日
1

Wenn die BILD Zeitung einen grünen Haken bekommt, weiß man, dass diese Erweiterung nichts weiter als FakeNews verbreitet.

语言 de
5 有用 · 2 无用