稳定信号未识别高风险权限组合
NewsGuard icon

NewsGuard

NewsGuard's rating shields and labels help users know which news and information websites to trust.

用户数20K当前公开安装规模
评分3.6商店平均评分
评论数519公开评论体量
Manifest 版本V3插件平台版本
7日增长0近 7 天净增用户
7日增长率0%相对周增长速度
视觉预览

NewsGuard 媒体预览

4 项素材
趋势

用户增长趋势

按已采集快照查看用户数变化。

用户增长趋势

20K20K20K20K20K2026年7月15日2026年7月18日2026年7月21日最新值: 20K
评分趋势

近 7 日评分趋势

展示最近 7 日窗口内已采集的评分快照,辅助判断近期评分是否稳定。

7 日评分变化

起始值
3.59
最新值
3.59
7 日评分变化
0.00
3.493.543.593.643.692026年7月15日2026年7月18日2026年7月21日最新值: 3.59
2026年7月15日2026年7月21日
增长概览

日/周/月增长表现

同口径展示 1 天、7 天、30 天的绝对增长与增长率。

1日增长持平
00%
7日增长持平
00%
30日增长减少
-10K-33.3%
技术摘要

版本、语言与抓取信息

查看发布时间、版本、支持语言、最近更新和抓取时间。

版本5.9.9
ManifestV3
大小1.57MiB
语言数1English
发布时间
最近更新
最近抓取
English
简介

插件简介

查看插件说明、主要功能和适用场景。

NewsGuard's reliability ratings for news and information sources help users make decisions about which news sources to trust—and avoid misinformation and disinformation.

Our ratings, scores, and Nutrition Labels for websites are displayed next to links on search engines and social media platforms and cover all the news websites accounting for 95% of online engagement.

Ratings are conducted by a team of experienced journalists using nine basic, apolitical journalistic criteria. Each site receives a trust score of 0-100, an overall rating level ranging from “High Credibility” to “Proceed with Caution,” and a thorough Nutrition Label report detailing the site’s ownership and financing, content, credibility practices, transparency practices, and history.

NewsGuard is for personal use only. Any commercial, research, or other non-personal use of NewsGuard is strictly prohibited by our Terms of Service: https://www.newsguardtech.com/terms-of-service/

评价

最新评论快照

查看最近评论和评分分布。

商店综合星级3.6Chrome 商店给出的聚合评分,包含只有打分但没有同步评论正文的情况
已同步评论均分3.3仅基于下方已同步评论正文计算
有内容评论346已同步的评论正文数量
总评分/评论数519Chrome 商店公开评分/评论计数

商店综合星级:3.6。下方星级分布只统计已同步评论正文;如果某个插件只有公开分数、没有真实评论正文,这里可能为空。

5
161
4
36
3
13
2
21
1
115
Carol Riecker2019年11月10日
5

This is a wonderful extension, it helps me pick reliable news sources, so I know I am getting a fair and balanced information. Especially on Facebook!

语言 en
1 有用 · 1 无用
Michael McCall2019年11月9日
4

Simple and easy to use.

语言 en
1 有用 · 0 无用
Coda Emir2019年11月9日
5

Love this tool, it helps me check bias and weigh news. It's not perfect, but its improving every day.

语言 en
1 有用 · 0 无用
Aaron Jackson2019年11月7日
4

It's fine for me but common sense is often better. It's good for those new to the internet

语言 en
1 有用 · 0 无用
Megan C-K2019年11月5日
5

This is a great source. I use it with my journalism students to teach media literacy. I am disappointed by all the 1 star reviews by people with low media literacy. There's a lot of cognitive dissonance going on in these reviews here. Goodness. Let me ask you this -- if they were truly biased in favor of the liberal media, why is Fox News (technically) rated green? Sheesh. Also, the 9 standards of credibility listed on their website say nothing about whether a news source is liberal or conservative. Maybe some people are just bitter that the news site that confirms all their suspicions isn't actually as credible -- or evidence-based -- as they thought...

语言 en
1 有用 · 0 无用
Varvara Litvinova2019年11月2日
5

Great in-depth analysis.

语言 en
2 有用 · 0 无用
Maciej Paprocki2019年10月31日
5

Great. When source is listed as invalid you can check why is that, so all those people saying here it is propaganda are wrong.

语言 en
1 有用 · 0 无用
Thermobot2019年10月29日
3

Many complain about "Fake News" still coming through. Which is only partially true because most fake news sites are filtered out. You should also be weary about the political alignment of the corperation behind it, Microsoft being a american multi billion corporation many have complained about the bad ratings of right leaning news outlets and others have complained about the bad ratings of non western news outlets like Sputnik, RT, and the good ratings of websites like The Sun or the German equivalent Die Bild, which published fake news in the past and don't follow basic journalistic standards, which, again, is very understandable. Overall a handy tool to have to help you double check information and to make researching easier, even if by far not all news sites are registered in their data banks and you still shouldn't trust them blindly.

语言 en
2 有用 · 1 无用
Kirk Sefchik2019年10月28日
5

Great extension! Super nice to know whether the site I'm reading is legit.

语言 en
1 有用 · 0 无用
Ferdinando Matteo Vella2019年10月27日
4

Un'estensione utile per capire cosa sta dietro ai siti di news. Non bisogna limitarsi a leggere il «foglietto illustrativo» ma, per capire bene cosa si sta leggendo, è utile approfondire con l'«etichetta nutrizionale completa», dove si possono trovare informazioni approfondite sugli assetti proprietari, esempi di fake news, linea editoriale, etc. Secondo me è un ottimo lavoro, ovviamente non esente da critiche come accade sempre quando si esprimono opinioni (ad esempio, è giudicato attendibile un sito come il Daily Mail); tuttavia qui si cerca di essere il più oggettivi possibili.

语言 it
2 有用 · 0 无用