稳定信号未识别高风险权限组合

NewsGuard

NewsGuard's rating shields and labels help users know which news and information websites to trust.

用户数20K当前公开安装规模

评分3.6商店平均评分

评论数519公开评论体量

Manifest 版本V3插件平台版本

7日增长0近 7 天净增用户

7日增长率0%相对周增长速度

视觉预览

NewsGuard 媒体预览

4 项素材

趋势

用户增长趋势

按已采集快照查看用户数变化。

用户增长趋势

评分趋势

近 7 日评分趋势

展示最近 7 日窗口内已采集的评分快照，辅助判断近期评分是否稳定。

7 日评分变化

起始值

3.59

日/周/月增长表现

同口径展示 1 天、7 天、30 天的绝对增长与增长率。

1日增长持平

00%

7日增长持平

00%

30日增长减少

-10K-33.3%

技术摘要

版本、语言与抓取信息

查看发布时间、版本、支持语言、最近更新和抓取时间。

版本5.9.9

ManifestV3

大小1.57MiB

语言数1English

发布时间--

插件简介

查看插件说明、主要功能和适用场景。

NewsGuard's reliability ratings for news and information sources help users make decisions about which news sources to trust—and avoid misinformation and disinformation.

Our ratings, scores, and Nutrition Labels for websites are displayed next to links on search engines and social media platforms and cover all the news websites accounting for 95% of online engagement.

Ratings are conducted by a team of experienced journalists using nine basic, apolitical journalistic criteria. Each site receives a trust score of 0-100, an overall rating level ranging from “High Credibility” to “Proceed with Caution,” and a thorough Nutrition Label report detailing the site’s ownership and financing, content, credibility practices, transparency practices, and history.

NewsGuard is for personal use only. Any commercial, research, or other non-personal use of NewsGuard is strictly prohibited by our Terms of Service: https://www.newsguardtech.com/terms-of-service/

评价

最新评论快照

查看最近评论和评分分布。

商店综合星级3.6Chrome 商店给出的聚合评分，包含只有打分但没有同步评论正文的情况

已同步评论均分3.3仅基于下方已同步评论正文计算

有内容评论346已同步的评论正文数量

总评分/评论数519Chrome 商店公开评分/评论计数

商店综合星级：3.6。下方星级分布只统计已同步评论正文；如果某个插件只有公开分数、没有真实评论正文，这里可能为空。

5★

161

4★

3★

2★

1★

115

Luja Frankopan2019年12月21日

Its okay for some websites, terrible for others. Gossip and opinion "news" sites are mostly rated as credible, given complete checkmarks for all their categories while in the detailed descriptions they give contradictory comments that make it sounds not credible. And not perfect but more legit news sites are given a "not credible" rating and even there they contradict themselves. Giving one rating (not publishing fake news for instance) then in the comments saying they publish fake news...

Scott Martinson2019年12月21日

Seems to come from a biased point of view as many sites are green that have shady news and its just propaganda.

Sebastian Bertram (Sebastian B)2019年12月15日

Hilft dabei, Fakenews auszusondern. Hilfreich!

Charles Capel2019年12月14日

Excellent, evidence-based, does not appear biased.

Jon McCarty2019年12月14日

I find it to be accurate in most cases. I especially like the Nutrition Labels; I appreciate seeing the reasons behind the final score. In most cases I agree with them. The reason that the app seems to be liberal-biased has more to do with how factual and honest a website is, many of the right-wing websites fail on either or both accounts. The only downside is the lack of feedback. I think that the feedback process should not be trivial; make us jump through some hoops, that will help to weed out the people who "have feelings" rather than people with supportable opinions.

Radek Wójs2019年12月12日

It just marks all the major outlets as 'reliable news providers'

Shandi Greve Penrod2019年12月11日

Thank you for providing an extension that attempts to rate websites based on how responsible the news editors act, how transparent they are with their funding sources, etc. I look forward to future improvements, as well, including a version for the Duck Duck Go mobile app.